https://pepfar.impactcounter.com/methodologykyle wrote: ↑Sun Mar 23, 2025 4:06 pm MY BS detector goes off when reading the source of that https://pepfar.impactcounter.com/
Anyhow, what about Ukraine? Wasn't there supposed to be peace?
https://pepfar.impactcounter.com/methodologykyle wrote: ↑Sun Mar 23, 2025 4:06 pm MY BS detector goes off when reading the source of that https://pepfar.impactcounter.com/
Honestly, the damage is already done. I used to think you were a bright kid but I'm absolutely stunned by the nonsense you post.
I still don't see what makes you think I am so far right I am a goner.
Oh that nothingburger. Hunter Biden was not part of the government, the whole thing happened in 2019, I can't quite remember who was in charge back then... and social media sites blocked the story on their own accord because it smelled of Russian disinformation, which, fair enough, turned out to be wrong. But all of the evidence really coming off of that was Hunter's drug problem, again, nothing to do with any government activity whatsoever.
Got specifics? All I can find is Zuckerberg talking, just recently, on Joe Rogan, about pressure to that effect, and according to him, they did not budge, which I applaud. And, well, the timing... if he really thought that was so scandalous, why has he not published it earlier? Like, right when it was happening? It's evident from elsewhere he wants to get on Trumps good side. (Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying he is outright lying there. Just, maybe, sprucing it up a little to please the known audience.)
You don't see it because your blindspot is huge. Your posts are full of regurgitated right-wing propaganda and from what I can tell you really do believe that the Democratic Party is a bunch of radical "woke" leftists. That is absurd. As an actual leftist I would love to have someone to vote for, but I don't. There is no viable leftist party in the US. The Democratic Party has very few left-leaning policies and those they actually work towards barely qualify for the weakest form of socialism imaginable. Even their best effort in national healthcare, the ACA, is just a scam to funnel paychecks and tax dollars to capitalists. Also, you seem to be under the impression that somehow businesses are inherently better than government but that's a misunderstanding of what government is and it's responsibilities.
No you don't. You voted for a billionaire real estate developer who views environmental regulations as a barrier to making more money and created DOGE to gut the EPA, among other organizations. You do *not* agree with the left on the environment. You don't even know what "the left" stands for on the environment.
No they didn't. The left has been pretty consistent on their views on keeping the peace. There's been no flipping at all. I don't know what you think you agreed to before that you're now willing to sell out Ukraine and Palestine, but the left has always supported Ukrainian independence and a two state solution in Palestine. Again, you don't know what "the left" actually stands for.I used to agree with the left on keeping peace, and not going to wars, but they flipped
Not really. You want the government to make healthcare decisions through legislation for large numbers of people. Your next statement gives it away.I agree with the right on having a smaller government,
The left doesn't believe in transitioning kids before they're adults. You have absolutely no understanding of either transgender people or "the left's" views of treating transgender people. So it's a lie for you to say you disagree with the left. You disagree with the strawman version of the left that your right-wing media has given you.I disagree with the left on giving kids drugs, for transitioning, I'm fine post 18, preferable post 24ish, to me it makes no sense you are barely developed and you want to give stuff up.
Ironically, this means you actually agree with the left, yet you say you disagree. You don't know what the REAL left thinks, you only know what you've been told by the people who want you to believe in the bogeyman leftist.I disagree with the left on having massive amount of illegal immigrants in the county, and subsidizing them better than the citizens. (the counter of that is I am 100% fine if they come here legally, and yes I agree we need better rules around that)
Wait until you see what the country looks like after DOGE has done its work. You'll change this view pretty quickly.I agree with whoever will make simpler tax policies, we are way over taxed for what we get.
I think after your first serious bout with dysentery after the EPA is gutted, you'll change your thinking here, too.I'm thanks to you guys more indifferent about a national health care system, If done correctly it would be good, but I don't have any confidence in our government to actually make it run effectively.
The transgender issues are playing out like they are because of insecure men who don't like knowing they're attracted to women with penises. That's the source of all the insecurity here. It's "Dude looks like a lady" made into public policy. OMG it's so ridiculous. I've never imagined that men would be so insecure in their masculinity that they'd have to target transgender women as a major platform policy for a huge political party. Now who's being triggered? Seriously, right-wingers are the worst snowflakes around. This is why when you say you voted for Trump, I assume you have a little dick and you're insecure about the bras you secretly wear, and you fear people like me who talk openly about these things like it's ******* Tuesday, because it is Tuesday for me.If that makes me a far right goner, GFY, If I'm no longer "bright" because of this, I think if you asked me 15 years ago, I would have said the same, maybe flipped on transgender issues, and that's because of the way it's been playing out, I would have been under 21 then, and did not realize the full effects.
No, it's not a tricky one. You don't get to force your views on when life begins onto other people. You keep your damn religion to yourself. If you really and truly believed in small government, you would not be using the government to make medical decisions through legislation for other people. You would let those people make their own medical decisions in proper consultation with their doctors. You don't believe that. So you're full of shit when you say you believe in small government. You believe in the biggest government imaginable, because you believe government should be making private, personal decisions for people.And no I did not mention abortion above, because that's a tricky one, There is no national ban on abortion, it's only at state levels. I've started leaning more pro life, than I used to be, but I don't know enough about to to really make an informed enough decision on it. There is always room for it if having the kid is going to cause death to the mother, and rape, especially of the under-aged, but when older, that's the one that gets tricky.
That demands strong agreement.
And going back a bit, that demands strong disagreement on so many levels...
From my prospective you don't feel compassionate about the girls getting hurt by the trans-girls, can you not have empathy for them, the body has physical limits due to your sex, so when you place an XY body into an XX sport like track, they are going to be able to dominate it. or like with volleyball they have much more power and cause severe injuries. Do you not feel any empathy for Payton McNabb?
We already have a lot of rules to protect children because their brains are still developing, they are still learning, still finding out who they are, somehow you think people know instantly this is who they are, who they are meant to be, I don't believe that to be the case. This is why we have smoking and drinking ages, to protect the underdeveloped brain. The better question is what percentage of kids who think they want to transition, would group up and change their mind about it.Z-Man wrote: ↑Tue Mar 25, 2025 5:30 pm Lucifer wrote: ↑25 Mar 2025 02:12
If you really and truly believed in small government, you
kyle wrote: ↑23 Mar 2025 09:46
weaken
would not be using the government to make medical decisions through legislation for other people. You would let those people make their own medical decisions in proper consultation with their doctors.
That demands strong agreement.
That is not my point I was making at all,
ya you guys already say I lost it, I don't give any more f**ks, so for what it's worth I'll spell it out, make me be the "joke" guy for being brave enough to actually spell this out to you all. It's such a simple concept, but yet so many people are unable to hear it or think it is just a lie because they want to secretly think that they can change, well I got news for you all
Is that not a form of vandalism?
When they literally take the car they sell 75% of from the market for a month or two to retool globally, sales will go down by get it 75%
Kyle, watch this entire video before spouting more ignorant bs about sex and gender. Also, call your mom and apologize for saying she's not a real woman anymore since menopause.Lucifer wrote: ↑Sun Feb 23, 2025 3:10 am Inb4 Z-Man
https://youtu.be/nVQplt7Chos?si=rSNimLhGhjOP5TXV
It's long, but we'll worth watching the whole thing. I think it closes the book on sex and gender identity for us non biologists
Yes, very "brave" misogyny. From your posts I can only come to the conclusion you are an incel with an unhealthy fixation on transwomen. This "simple concept" isn't simple once you realize intersex people exist (they DO exist). Also, from a historical standpoint, cultures will sometimes adopt androgyny as a desirable trait for a while (most recently Victorian era Europe) and it's possible we are transitioning through one now.
There is a lot of anti-trans propaganda surrounding this story and a lot of unverified claims. Since there is little truth to be known, instead I'll share a story. Nearly 20 years ago I was watching live roller derby because I knew some of the players indirectly. These girls were tough as bricks, and me, a grown man, would absolutely would not fight one (because I would lose). During the match I watched a girl get her neck broken. The entire building was mortified and the event was immediately cancelled. Two points I want to make: 1) The girls who play this sport are absolute bruisers and, in some stereotypical ways, extremely manly. 2) Freak accidents happen in sports and you can't always blame someone.
How many of these rules so far are in place to protect the children from Doctors? Last I checked, Doctors don't tend to prescribe drinking and smoking.
Well, 80-85 years ago, they surely had bigger worries and more relevant causes of deaths when they were rounded up along with Jews, communists and homosexuals for the concentration camps, around here at least... and considering homosexuality was still illegal in all of the USA about sixty years ago and trans people typically had it worse, lack of the medical procedures we have today wasn't at the top of their list of problems.
A significant portion of cis people also receive hormone treatment. And not just women in menopause. Actually, I just googled "Hormone Therapy" or "HRT", and had to work a bit to find the first mention of trans people
Sounds like a brain worm speaking. Here is an enlightening take on that: https://infosec.exchange/@nazgul/114128164442280069
No, if anything, I would classify that as sabotage, interfering with the production process. But it's not even that. I have no contract with them to give good training data for their AI, so no obligation to provide it.
The percentage is much smaller than 99%. It could actually be under 50%, we don't have enough data. Also, the XY pair is getting bred out and may cease to exist in another hundred years or so, as it already has in numerous other mammalian species. There are hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of XX men with fully functional reproductive systems, along with a comparable number of XY women, also with fully functional reproductive systems, all cisgender.