Fortress-For-All - Discussion

[Hoax]

Well done Ratchet

It sounds like quite a few chumps didn't show, don't sign up if you're not definitely going to play

[PyrrhicVictory]

Sad I missed it, sounds like it was quite some fun.

Ratchet, are you planning on doing this on a monthly basis?

[bilbo baggins]

Sad I missed it, sounds like it was quite some fun.

Ratchet, are you planning on doing this on a monthly basis?

due to the time needed for this and the difference in nature to the ladle i think this should be a quarterly event, monthly would be a bit of an overkill

[PyrrhicVictory]

Sad I missed it, sounds like it was quite some fun.

Ratchet, are you planning on doing this on a monthly basis?

due to the time needed for this and the difference in nature to the ladle i think this should be a quarterly event, monthly would be a bit of an overkill

Agreed. I thought I read Ratchet saying "next month" somewhere. After looking through the topic I cannot seem to find it anymore, so it probably was only in my mind.

Anyways, I think this tournament adds some of the missing "serious" fort-time. There's no way to prepare for ladle in 9v9-servers. If this event will only occur every few months, we should think about resurrecting spoon or something similar. I remember playing in a spoon once, which gave me some good fort-practice right before ladle.

[Ratchet]

Did anyone try downloading the file and not succeed? DGM said his computer didn't like it, and the file is too large to upload to the forums. I can't think of any extremely reliable sources to upload a recording file to - I may create a free website somewhere to upload it to.

Edit: http://playgr0und.x10.mx/home/Armagetro ... ording.zip

[Light]

Did anyone try downloading the file and not succeed? DGM said his computer didn't like it, and the file is too large to upload to the forums. I can't think of any extremely reliable sources to upload a recording file to - I may create a free website somewhere to upload it to.

Edit: http://playgr0und.x10.mx/home/Armagetro ... ording.zip

For me, it gets to the "Online Multiplayer" button and freezes. Then I have to kill -9 to get rid of it.

[Ratchet]

Did anyone try downloading the file and not succeed? DGM said his computer didn't like it, and the file is too large to upload to the forums. I can't think of any extremely reliable sources to upload a recording file to - I may create a free website somewhere to upload it to.

Edit: http://playgr0und.x10.mx/home/Armagetro ... ording.zip

For me, it gets to the "Online Multiplayer" button and freezes. Then I have to kill -9 to get rid of it.

Odd it plays through on my end

[Titanoboa]

Might have to do with what version and OS you're using (to record, and playback). If I understand it correctly, it's most likely to work if both are same, so it's no wonder it's working for you hatchet.

[Light]

Might have to do with what version and OS you're using (to record, and playback). If I understand it correctly, it's most likely to work if both are same, so it's no wonder it's working for you hatchet.

Possibly. I use the latest 0.4 Linux release, and it's most likely that he uses 0.2. Don't feel like getting it to test though.

[Aiphaton]

If a player drafts 3 unk, I don't see the problem in that. They want the players they want and if 3 unk players fell to them, they should be able to take them. If anything, you should make it so that the team leader doesn't provide a bias based on the clan they're in if you have too.

uNk isn't a clan btw ... we're a team ^^

err why doesn't the quote work?

[Light]

err why doesn't the quote work?

You probably ticked the "Disable BBCode" checkbox.

[Aiphaton]

haha yea i did thanks

[Overrated]

If a player drafts 3 unk, I don't see the problem in that. They want the players they want and if 3 unk players fell to them, they should be able to take them. If anything, you should make it so that the team leader doesn't provide a bias based on the clan they're in if you have too.

uNk isn't a clan btw ... we're a team ^^

err why doesn't the quote work?

Fixed, but you know what I meant. I consider unk a clan just as much as I consider Revolver one as well.

[ElmosWorld]

If a player drafts 3 unk, I don't see the problem in that. They want the players they want and if 3 unk players fell to them, they should be able to take them. If anything, you should make it so that the team leader doesn't provide a bias based on the clan they're in if you have too.

uNk isn't a clan btw ... we're a team ^^

Read this.

[Pr3]

If a player drafts 3 unk, I don't see the problem in that. They want the players they want and if 3 unk players fell to them, they should be able to take them. If anything, you should make it so that the team leader doesn't provide a bias based on the clan they're in if you have too.

uNk isn't a clan btw ... we're a team ^^

Read this.

I agree with Concord's assessment on the "irrelevancy of team-clan terminology"; however his statement "Team Unknown is a clan" is Concord's opinion, and based on his definition of a team/clan. Correct me if I'm wrong, but frankly you can call yourself a team or a clan because their basically the same thing. There is no proof we are even "clans"... unless we're all "a group of people tracing descent from a common ancestor" (probably are), but there is a good definition for a team, "a number of persons associated together in work or activity"; under this definition we all could be "teams". Regardless if uNk is a team or a clan, that's up for you to decide. I consider the Team in our name to be affixed regardless of opinions.