Ladle Team "The Immortals" Want to play :>

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

User avatar
Mkay1
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Ladle Team "The Immortals" Want to play :>

Post by Mkay1 »

LucK wrote:Not going to lie it's kind of a bitch move on unks part. It's ladle everyone wants to play and if given the opportunity I hope if unk signs up late that whoever decides denies them the opportunity to play.
Fyi, we will not sign up late. We are punctual.
gawdzilla
Liz of the many names
Posts: 1124
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:13 am

me looking at this hot ass mess and turning around, asap.

Post by gawdzilla »

Image
Concord
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:24 pm

Re: Ladle Team "The Immortals" Want to play :>

Post by Concord »

hehe
User avatar
dreadlord
Match Winner
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:26 am
Location: Germany

Re: Ladle Team "The Immortals" Want to play :>

Post by dreadlord »

owned wrote:I guess I came late to the party. What happened?
Cody's team wanted to take part in the ladle though the sign ups were closed yet. They asked Tu for giving their ~bye~ away and playing the first round versus Cody's team instead.
Tu agreed, no rules were broken = everything was fine but then LucK complained somehow about something. All in all such a mess would not have been necessary but I think this topic can be locked now before this unnecessary discussion goes on.
owned
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 876
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Ladle Team "The Immortals" Want to play :>

Post by owned »

That was the part I understood. But did something happen with players being switched?
User avatar
Cody <3
Match Winner
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:08 am
Location: Indiana

Re: Ladle Team "The Immortals" Want to play :>

Post by Cody <3 »

owned wrote:That was the part I understood. But did something happen with players being switched?
can we please just play ladle? everything is handled....
NEW 1v1 Sumo SB Tournament SITE
http://1v1sb.weebly.com
User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6488
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle Team "The Immortals" Want to play :>

Post by sinewav »

owned wrote:That was the part I understood. But did something happen with players being switched?
There was no real switching because there weren't 2 teams. It was one team broken into two. So, they had to find a comfortable way to split 14 players into two groups.

On the surface, one might try to equate this to Speeders' previous shuffling of players between teams. But this really isn't the case here since Cody's team gains no advantage. This is because any team they request a bye from can simply say "sorry, can't help you."

Everything was open, honest, and handled perfectly. Some might think the rules have somehow broken down. I think the contrary. To me, it looks like a success of our system. It shows fairness and flexibility, both of which are essential to the success and enjoyment of the tournament.

:) Good luck today, everyone.
User avatar
arilou
Average Program
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Austin Texas
Contact:

Re: Ladle Team "The Immortals" Want to play :>

Post by arilou »

owned wrote:That was the part I understood. But did something happen with players being switched?
No man, it was a simple case of Red having the 6 he wanted at the making of the brackets. The 5-6 that wanted to play were bummed Red waited so late because the whole time we kept saying 2 teams. Cody initiated the last minute thing cause he knew the mechanics of how the Ladle worked.

You have my word we would never pull any kind of antics. The second team was an overflow team. Thanks TU for being a good sports and well done on beating us.
"Day after day, alone on a hill, the man with a foolish grin is keeping perfectly still" --- Billy Shears
owned
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 876
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Ladle Team "The Immortals" Want to play :>

Post by owned »

Apologies if it seemed like I was accusing you of anything. I was just wondering what it was that happened. Now that I know what occurred, I completely agree with sine that a lot of this anger was unfounded.
The guidelines say that:
After the brackets have been set a Team Leader may change a maximum of two players per team. Only two players per team can be added or switched.
Note that taking a player off of the roster is still legal. They can't be penalized for "switching" either because the team that their players went to was not on the bracket. The Immortals also can't be penalized for this either because when players were added to their team, it was before they had joined the bracket.

As for the bye issue, I think we need to clarify in the guidelines that a team asks the second bye if the first bye refuses, and then the third bye, and so on. When I read the guidelines, I assumed that a team is completely blocked out if the first bye responds no. I don't want anyone else to make this mistake in the future.

Although I suppose I am just restating things people have already said.
User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6488
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle Team "The Immortals" Want to play :>

Post by sinewav »

owned wrote:As for the bye issue, I think we need to clarify in the guidelines that a team asks the second bye if the first bye refuses, and then the third bye, and so on.
Ok, that's easy enough. Here (addition in bold):

"In the event your team misses the sign up deadline, and one or more teams have a bye in the first round, you may ask the team with the first bye for permission to fill the open slot. If they refuse, go through the byes in order. No team is under any obligation to give up a bye, and open slots are first come, first serve."
Post Reply