Competition Time Poll, pt 2

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply

Would you want to play Saturdays competitively at 21-23 GMT (5-7 pm EST)

Poll ended at Mon Nov 04, 2013 7:13 pm

Yes & I am EU
3
13%
Yes & I am NA
8
33%
No & I am EU
7
29%
No & I am NA
4
17%
No & I am NA west coast
2
8%
 
Total votes: 24

Concord
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:24 pm

Competition Time Poll, pt 2

Post by Concord »

Please consider a hypothetical 1 hour league match, on Saturdays, when voting.
thanks
Venijn
Round Winner
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:18 pm

Re: Competition Time Poll, pt 2

Post by Venijn »

Not to be awkward or anything, but I voted the opposite way on this than I did the other.

I don't know about most people, but I personally don't feel like giving up both my weekend days every weekend (we train on Sundays) for tron. As there are generally some Sundays available each month, couldn't those be used instead? People are mostly available at ladle time...

Perhaps this says more about my lack of commitment though.
Click. Image
User avatar
RoterBaron1337
Core Dumper
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 4:37 pm

Re: Competition Time Poll, pt 2

Post by RoterBaron1337 »

^what she said. im totally with her statement
Kappa
Overrated
Match Winner
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:32 am

Re: Competition Time Poll, pt 2

Post by Overrated »

I voted the same as the other, because it's too late. I don't like the sound of possibly isolating EU players out. Since most of our players are split between NA and EU (I imagine there are more NA/Western Hemisphere, but that might be because of when I play). The easiest thing to do would move it to a time between the two where it can best accommodate a majority of the people who plan to play in it. If that fails, then try an open Sunday, unless you're planning this weekly then I'd say put it between the two times suggested.
BRAWL dead. RIP.

Fort is like a box of knives, you never know when you're going to be cut.
Concord
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:24 pm

Re: Competition Time Poll, pt 2

Post by Concord »

answer the poll question please, do not vote whether you think a certain time is a good idea, the poll will show that itself. If you vote based on other's availability, which you just cited as an explanation of your vote, the poll loses its meaning.
Venijn
Round Winner
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:18 pm

Re: Competition Time Poll, pt 2

Post by Venijn »

RoterBaron1337 wrote:^what he said. im totally with his statement
Not sure if trolling.jpg
Click. Image
Overrated
Match Winner
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:32 am

Re: Competition Time Poll, pt 2

Post by Overrated »

Concord wrote:answer the poll question please, do not vote whether you think a certain time is a good idea, the poll will show that itself. If you vote based on other's availability, which you just cited as an explanation of your vote, the poll loses its meaning.
Not mentioning the fact I work often, and that also messes my schedules up and its difficult for me to judge whether I can be there, so most times I won't, especially when I have more pressing needs than arranging my entire schedule around tron. Nights and late afternoons are generally bad for me.

And also, would I want to compete then? No, because I wouldn't get the fullest experience and the best opponents all around. Would I if I had to and could? Probably, but it's not what I want; which is what you're asking.
BRAWL dead. RIP.

Fort is like a box of knives, you never know when you're going to be cut.
Concord
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:24 pm

Re: Competition Time Poll, pt 2

Post by Concord »

all you had to do was not not mention that instead of citing the reason you did.

why do you seem so offended?
Overrated
Match Winner
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:32 am

Re: Competition Time Poll, pt 2

Post by Overrated »

Concord wrote:all you had to do was not not mention that instead of citing the reason you did.

why do you seem so offended?
Previous poll I mentioned I had work, this time I told you why I wouldn't want to play it and you said not to consider other people's availability. I'm not really offended, I just don't see how you thought that considering other people isn't also a factor towards determining if you want to play in something. Again, the poll says if you'd want too, not if you would.

I was just responding to your comment to defend my reasoning; this one I'm responding to your question. Are there any problems with this?
BRAWL dead. RIP.

Fort is like a box of knives, you never know when you're going to be cut.
Post Reply