Ladle 18

kyle · Post by **kyle** » Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:37 am

February 8, 2009?

Just wondering since that is approaching 1 month away, It is always nice to have a few weeks of planning before them

Sign up
http://wiki.armagetronad.net/index.php? ... enge_Board

Corn1 · Post by **Corn1** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 5:14 am

Wouldn't the third make more sense as its on a Sunday?

EDIT: nvm I was looking at the 2008 calender

~*PsYkO*~ · Post by **~*PsYkO*~** » Wed Dec 31, 2008 8:00 am

Corn1 wrote:Wouldn't the third make more sense as its on a Sunday?

EDIT: nvm I was looking at the 2008 calender

hehe. Noob

Post by **epsy** » Thu Jan 01, 2009 11:12 pm

brawl, then TST, then ladle? bad idea
better have it on the 8th

kyle · Post by **kyle** » Fri Jan 02, 2009 2:59 am

Edit, I forgot epsy had announced the TST already, Fine with me if it is the following week

DDMJ · Post by **DDMJ** » Fri Jan 02, 2009 3:16 am

kyle wrote:I forgot epsy had announced the TST already

Sweet, he didn't even announce it here :\/

2020 · Post by **2020** » Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:19 pm

wow
ladle 17 looked busy
congrats to the twisted rats

a lot of players
wd all

freako · Post by **freako** » Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:31 pm

@ Concord: Next time when u start to change the ladle page, please do the whole thing

people can't see the changed date from the comp. hub

Edit:
1. Cleared the challenge board (followed durka's latest post about the the board/although it looks odd)
2. Corrected the dates

Concord · Post by **Concord** » Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:41 pm

hehe

yeah

Post by **epsy** » Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:18 pm

Talking about wiki edits, could you please put meaningful edit messages, and only check "minor edit" when not changing the meaning of the article?

DDMJ · Post by **DDMJ** » Sun Jan 04, 2009 4:51 am

epsy wrote:Talking about wiki edits, could you please put meaningful edit messages, and only check "minor edit" when not changing the meaning of the article?

aww you don't like my edit msgs? damn :\/

owned · Post by **owned** » Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:55 am

Also, as was talked about last time, should we have seeding? It seems practical considering there's a great chance (3 of the 4 have already signed up) that all 4 top 4 teams from the previous ladle will play. Should it be applied for the top 4 teams?

DDMJ · Post by **DDMJ** » Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:31 am

owned wrote:Also, as was talked about last time, should we have seeding? It seems practical considering there's a great chance (3 of the 4 have already signed up) that all 4 top 4 teams from the previous ladle will play. Should it be applied for the top 4 teams?

I think just top 2 should be seeded since the top 4 might not always be in the next Ladle. Even if they are, I still think only top 2. That is, of course, if more than 8 teams sign up, which will hopefully be the case.

Also, why has no one linked to the Challenge Board. If newer players are viewing this thread wondering wtf's going on...

http://wiki.armagetronad.net/index.php? ... enge_Board

DDMJ · Post by **DDMJ** » Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:34 am

Also, to CT, X, DS, and all the teams that usually just link to their memberlist on their forums, can you guys please enter an actual list of who's going to be playing for you guys. Since we're trying to enforce this "locking" of teams thing, it's unfair if you guys have a remote link to manage your players-list seeing as you could easily change it even after the deadline. It's not that time consuming, SP did it.

EDIT: Damn, I thought I added this to my other post. Sorry for the double-post.

kyle · Post by **kyle** » Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:08 am

DDMJ wrote: Also, why has no one linked to the Challenge Board. If newer players are viewing this thread wondering wtf's going on...

Added it to first post