Organised matches, for the "majority", have begun

Monkey · Post by **Monkey** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:29 pm

http://wiki.armagetronad.net/index.php? ... ed_Matches

sinewav · Post by **sinewav** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:22 pm

I like it. But can you define in detail "the majority?" Is it 51%-49%, or something more like 5/6ths? What happens when the defined majority is split on a decision? I'm surely over-thinking this, but if you have a majority it seems like eligibility to vote will eventually need to be defined also.

Can't wait to play!

Monkey · Post by **Monkey** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:58 pm

I guess it is like the Ladle. I am not "in charge" on this, I just got the ball rolling and will have input just like anyone else. Read the VIP thread for more information.

K-Yo · Post by **K-Yo** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:10 pm

I've added some "rules"
let's try to do this like lot's of thinks over the net: "no leader, talks to decide, then if really needed, a poll" and in that case, the majority could be 50,00...01% to 49,99...9%

owned · Post by **owned** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:12 am

50±1/infinity

sol · Post by **sol** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:55 pm

anarchy FTW!

jk

Monkey · Post by **Monkey** » Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:21 pm

I have given K-Yo the additional server configs and I will be admin for the first match, to get things started. K-Yo is perfectly capable of adjusting the configs for future matches. I don't particularly want to be the main admin in future matches. I would do it, if no other admin is available, for any given match.

+swissdevnull · Post by **+swissdevnull** » Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:21 pm

Monkey wrote:http://wiki.armagetronad.net/index.php? ... ed_Matches

ok im here monkey

Monkey · Post by **Monkey** » Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:01 pm

Hi dev.

Joe · Post by **Joe** » Thu Dec 11, 2008 10:17 pm

so it looks like the second game is going to fill up, what server is it going to be hosted on and the time and that?

Monkey · Post by **Monkey** » Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:27 pm

Hey JJ. The details that we have are up there. The ones that are missing K-Yo will fill in when he knows, I guess.

1200 · Post by **1200** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:16 pm

How about top 8 players (according to individual score) from each server does another best of 5 after the first one is over....

PS: Maybe make it so that if two people have a same score, whoever's name appear higher on the score list has the priority...

Post by **epsy** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:42 pm

1200 wrote:How about top 8 players (according to individual score) from each server does another best of 5 after the first one is over....

Holy shit NO! One best of 5 is enough, I don't want to end up playing up to 10 matches..

1200 wrote:whoever's name appear higher on the score list has the priority...

This isn't reliable, it entirely depends on when you check the score table(and thus can vary between two different clients)

1200 · Post by **1200** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:26 pm

Epsy Wrote:

Holy shit NO! One best of 5 is enough, I don't want to end up playing up to 10 matches..

10 matches is less than total matches if a 3 round Ladle was to go to da wire each round.
(3 + 3 + 5= 11)

But anywayz maybe ur not into it. How bout others? And lets say if there's enuff interest at the end of the first bout.
Hey u neva kno....both matches could end in a straight fashion..

Epsy Wrote:

This isn't reliable, it entirely depends on when you check the score table(and thus can vary between two different clients)

Ok what if we go by the client of the admin???

Post by **epsy** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:38 pm

1200 wrote:10 matches is less than total matches if a 3 round Ladle was to go to da wire each round.

I don't want to be playing ladles all the time..

Armagetron Forums

Organised matches, for the "majority", have begun

Organised matches, for the "majority", have begun

Re: Organised matches, for the "majority", have be