Ladle 18

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply
User avatar
madmax
Round Winner
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 11:14 pm

Post by madmax »

2020 wrote:semi recording stops at exactly 40 seconds
says the connection has been lost...
Bah, I see exactly the same issue with the final, when using 0.2.8.2.1.
Could it be the fact that the recording was produced on another OS? Since I think 2020 uses OS X too...
Winner of the How Many Pages Before The Lock® competition and a grand total of 18,93 euros in Euromillions.
Top
User avatar
Z-Man
God & Project Admin
Posts: 11710
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Cologne
Contact:
Contact Z-Man

Post by Z-Man »

Yes. While usually not a problem, recordings are in theory very fragile by nature. Change a single library, switch your compiler or US, change one line of source code, pick different compiler options, and recordings may break.

/me points yet again to the protobuf stuff which should make it easy to create a Python client from scratch that both acts as a dumb proxy and network recorder.
Top
Word
Reverse Adjust Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 4310
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:13 pm

Post by Word »

congratulations :)
Top
Flex
Round Winner
Posts: 233
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:44 pm

Post by Flex »

I'm using 0.3.0.5558 (Yes I know it's old!) Recordings back in Ladle 16/17 worked (I think.) But with the recordings Z-Man posted, just seems to join an empty server and disconnect after a few seconds. Just thought I'd share this.

Didn't do anything spectacular, so I'm not bothered. :P
Top
User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6472
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:
Contact sinewav

Post by sinewav »

I just wanted to say this Ladle was a great time for me. Was it really 14 teams? Wow. I was very happy for MAX_CLIENTS 32 so I could watch the final match.

Even with all the argumentative discussions of seeding, rules, and time changes, we all came together and had a great time. Let's keep it up!
Top
owned
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 876
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:01 pm

Post by owned »

did we ever end up having a 3rd place match?
Top
User avatar
Corn1
Core Dumper
Posts: 124
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:53 pm

Post by Corn1 »

owned wrote:did we ever end up having a 3rd place match?
No we didn't.
Neither teams were able to round up enough players to do a 3rd place match. (For example the only TR players i found online after the game was me, JJbean, and Durka.)
Top
User avatar
1200
Round Winner
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 10:10 pm
Location: Another Planet

Post by 1200 »

No we didn't.
Neither teams were able to round up enough players to do a 3rd place match. (For example the only TR players i found online after the game was me, JJbean, and Durka.)
Just curious was 3rd place match even in the schedule? I didn't see it on the challenge board....
Top
owned
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 876
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:01 pm

Post by owned »

owned wrote:
1200 wrote:Wone Woned Two Two Said
I think we should add a 3rd place match to the bracket.
/me agrees. And if we gonna have a 3rd place match why not use this information and have 4 seeds every Ladle?
/me agrees. We already have 4 seeds from Ladle 17 so we can use them.

1.TR
2.CT
3.X
4.SP
owned wrote:I think we should add a 3rd place match to the bracket.
owned wrote:We can also have a 3rd place match added to the bracket.
owned wrote:I like how somebody edited the new ladder. Now we just need a 3rd place spot. (I propose the maps be the same as the 2nd semifinal)
owned wrote:Third place match?
Well I (and others) certainly asked.
Top
User avatar
1200
Round Winner
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 10:10 pm
Location: Another Planet

Post by 1200 »

Yes a lotta things are asked but not answered often....
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Competitions”