Moderator: Light
Tank Program wrote:Off-topic: Deja vu.
[size=0]Some people will know what I'm talking about.[/size]
Z-Man wrote:Drama! We need more Drama!
Freako* hands Tank, Z-man and lucifer some beer and snacksLucifer wrote:He should have gone with a triumvirate, so we could at least watch a stabbing.
Ooh! Here we come! No, I was offering a VIP server, but your overly strict rules that were not written anywhere denied me to run the server the way I wanted, and you wanted to "lock" the players in. At that point I realized you were just sharing your opinion with ed's, which was to lock their server users, which is one of the things that got me quite pissed off at both of you.Monkey wrote:I should also note that epsy left the VIP in a temper because I would not let him run a VIP server. He wanted to do this because ed (from CT) would not let him on the main VIP server, that ed owns/pays for. The reason that ed would let him on the server is because epsy insulted his wife, in public, on the CT forums. Nice...
But wait! We got Monkey already!Monkey wrote:Where are hyphy and Phytotron when you need them?
Indeed it didn't die at all! With 6 people of which almost none actually "listens" to you, it's freaking alive and kicking!Monkey wrote:VIP didn't die.
Oh, and, uhm, does the lie in question have to come out of someone else's mouths as yours? oh..Monkey wrote:Anyway, back to ignoring epsy..until the next lie pops up...
Wow.... So all this crap was happening but you still managed to keep in undercover...It'd be interesting if someone started a 1vs1 fortress ranking system.As we have more people and hence servers, people that signup for each match will be put on a server according to their skill rank (we need to think about how to rank mathematically when we have more than one server).
Yea why not? Play 2 matches. Each player picks a server of their choice. Play one match on each server. Basically you take turns defending each round. Add the scores of the two matches to see who wins. If draw play 2 more matches. I'm inclined to think this is more accurate than trying to figure out a ladder mathematically with stats.What do you mean 1v1? You mean literally playing matches of 1 players vs 1 player?
You should have come to a few of the vip matches, with Monkey in charge there was always fun to be hadZ-Man wrote:Drama! We need more Drama!
I don't like the 1v1 idea and can't see how it tells you how people play in a team game. Surely you must rank people on performance within a team.1200 wrote:It'd be interesting if someone started a 1vs1 fortress ranking system.
No.Sol wrote:I think he does his first steps towards forming a new clan.
You did read my first post in this thread, right? "nearly always controversial" would depend on who you ask. My methods are for those that want strict and serious matches but not for others. This new system allows for people, that lack the desire and/or self-discipline to participate in strict and serious matches, to participate in less strict and serious matches that they all have a say in.ed wrote:Although his methods were nearly always controversial...and I hope a better system grows from its ashes.
I am diplomatic with people that show the same respect to the game as me.ed wrote:I also hope Monkey can learn some diplomacy along the way.
I was just chipping in an idea becausewtf does 1v1 ranks have to do with this, and moreover, you can't¹ make individual rankings for a team game..
¹: for the ladder freaks out here, read "shouldn't"
As we have more people and hence servers, people that signup for each match will be put on a server according to their skill rank (we need to think about how to rank mathematically when we have more than one server).
