Right now it's just going to result in thousands of new gig workers choking up the system.
quick list
Measles, Mpox, all started because of a harmful COVID vaccine, that was forced by the Biden administration, this made more people not want to get their children vaxed,Word wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 7:20 pm - lots of dead people in poor countries https://archive.ph/Rm3eA
- measles making a comeback
- throwing Ukraine under the bus
- making your future life much more expensive and dangerous in general thanks to whatever he does to destroy the "Deep State", downsizing all public services that control private businesses and hostile powers, e.g. food inspectors, the CIA, and the like.
From what is publicly known, Europe already spends more than the US.
US Covid death rate vs that of other wealthy countries, NY TimesMeasles, Mpox, all started because of a harmful COVID vaccine, that was forced by the Biden administration, this made more people not want to get their children vaxed
Any other examples? A quick google search reveals this ban was already underway during Biden: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-n ... rcna183095We are only getting rid of the waste in the departments, the people carelessly spending the taxpayers money, and those listening to what private companies want, that are not really safe for us. Like how the FDA is bribed by the oil industry to allow for a by-product of gasoline production to be used in our food coloring,
The real world is amazing, you should open your eyes to it.
This is how I know you are brainwashed. I would absolutely love a woke left government. Instead I live in a capitalist hellhole where corporations write the laws for exploiting the population and reaping the benefits of a two-tierd justice system.
Yet Biden amplified this two-tiered justice system, allowing illegal criminals in to commit horrible crimes, like raping and killing kids, letting them go only to come back and do it again, If i raped a kid, and killed them I'd be in jail for life.
If you simply copy paste your last reply into chatgpt, chatgpt will tell you that you're basing your opinions on false assumptions or mischaracterizations at least 3 out of 4 times, emphasis by me. I recommend you go there yourself and ask for its sources. Or you could ask how the Trump administration will improve/worsen your life.kyle wrote:Word, use a source that is not biased by funding from the woke left government.
I'll write your response for you and encourage you to continue the conversation with the AI: "But that's because ChatGPT is fed with leftist propaganda"First, the idea that Biden has created a “two-tiered justice system” that allows criminals to roam free is simply not supported by facts. Under Biden, illegal border crossings have been met with increased enforcement, including the use of Trump-era policies like Title 42 and expanded deportations. Crime committed by undocumented immigrants is actually lower than that committed by native-born Americans, according to multiple studies. No one—Republican or Democrat—wants violent criminals on the streets. The justice system has flaws, but blaming one party for all of them oversimplifies a complex issue.[comment by Word: Yes, sinewav brought up the "two-tiered justice system", but it remains true that Biden isn't to blame personally for every issue that has troubled the US for at least 3 decades. Here's the thing kyle: About every criminologist will tell you that "stronger borders" don't result in less crimes. You're actually committing a much larger crime by not letting people in. To curb the crime rate, you need gun control as well as complicated socio-economic law and police reform, but you can't fit that as a motto on a bumper sticker.]
As for the claim that Democrats didn’t stand to honor the child who became an honorary Secret Service member, that’s incorrect. Many Democrats did stand, and the event was widely respected across party lines. It’s easy to focus on moments of division, but both sides have a history of selectively showing or withholding applause at political events.
Regarding unions, it’s fair to critique corruption where it exists, but unions have historically played a key role in securing better wages, safer working conditions, and job security. The idea that they have made society “lazy” ignores the fact that union jobs often require highly skilled labor, and many non-union workers benefit from the wage standards they help set. Attacking unions as a whole instead of calling for reforms where needed dismisses the legitimate benefits they provide to millions of workers.
You mention Elon Musk and suggest that Democrats oppose him because he’s doing "the most good for humanity." Musk is a brilliant businessman, but he’s also a billionaire who benefits from government subsidies and labor laws—many of which Democrats have supported. Criticizing Musk isn’t the same as attacking innovation. It’s about holding powerful people accountable, just as we should for politicians or union leaders.
Finally, I agree that we need leaders who promote personal responsibility, high-quality work, and an environmentally sustainable future. But Trump’s policies—such as rolling back environmental protections and rejecting climate science—don’t align with that vision. You suggest Democrats have lost your support, but their policies on healthcare, workers’ rights, and climate action are still very much about protecting average Americans. If Republicans offer better solutions, they should be debated on their merits, not based on political tribalism.
I respect that you value common sense, but I’d argue that common sense doesn’t lean toward any one politician—it leans toward facts, fairness, and policies that actually improve lives. If we strip away the partisan labels and focus on real solutions, we might find more common ground than you think.
I get that criticism a lot, but the reality is that my responses are based on a broad range of sources, including academic studies, government data, and reporting from across the political spectrum. If you think something I said is factually incorrect, let’s break it down—what specifically do you disagree with, and what evidence supports your view?
I’m open to a real discussion, but just saying "it’s left-wing media" dismisses the argument without actually engaging with it. If the facts support your point, I’ll acknowledge it. But let’s talk about facts, not just assumptions.
Democrats never had my support. You are under the illusion that Democrats are "left". They aren't, they don't stand for any leftist policies. Your problem is you don't know what "left" is or what leftists believe. You are fed a bunch of nonsense by right-wing propaganda and can't see that Democrats are just Republican light. Both of them are owned by capitalists, it's only the Democrats that talk about left policies without actually doing anything leftist. Literally both major political parties are corporations! Also, leftists don't want unions because unions don't accomplish the goal of erasing systemic inequality. The fact you are talking about unions reinforces my claim you are clueless. There is a whole world of political thought out there and you haven't even touched the surface.
Well, even if that were accurate, Musk and Trump just cut funding for cancer research, shows how much they really care.
That 'going straight to the source' is listening to people telling you how great they are. Facts: Right wingers lie, a lot. They lie to you about problems, they lie to you about how they can fix them.
Fixed that for you
Anti-Vaxxers existed way before COVID, and the mRNA vaccines were pretty safe, certainly safer than getting infected without the vaccines. Even looking at just the most prominent unusual side effect of the vaccines, the heart muscle inflammation: The virus did the same thing, more often (about twice as often) and with worse outcomes (up to people needing heart transplants).That's certainly a big contributing factor, obesity increased your risk of bad outcomes.
I think 1 stood, so 1 is many now? watch it, CGPT is great at making up it's own alternative narrative when it has no clue about the event at all.
We will have research soon, just pulling away from places that 80-90% of the funds are going to support administrative costs rather than research, so many places are inefficient at using the the money we spend. I guarantee you once the Ukraine war funds get audited, we will find records of them not receiving a significant portion of them. They likely got them, just claimed they did not or claimed the did but were damaged. Ponzi schemes like this to then take the "unreceived" or "damaged" items out of inventory, (to make money of of) have been going on for decades.
