Well, I wouldn't say it was a direct result of him, but he was a part of it. I don't know if I can say it was a mistake or not to remove him, but I would say it surely hasn't helped us to push one of the more active players away. I had (maybe still have ...) a strong dislike for him, so I would probably vote to do it again, but if I don't make it personal, it would make more sense to keep him here as far as activity goes.Ratchet wrote:Ironically, that's why this thread was started. According to OP, the direct result of removing someone we didn't like.
It's more enjoyable without him here, and that may be the case for you if others were removed as well. Those of us wanting a larger number of users playing would suffer, but the others who may not dislike a smaller, probably closer group of people will benefit. This game is kind of outdated as far as the gameplay goes, and it's difficult to imagine getting many more users without money being involved, so it's likely that the small group of players is what this game will be for some time to come (which I would say it already is).
So, I think it all depends on which side of things you're on. I'm obviously for a more active, larger community, and the others here seem to be more for a smaller, but better quality community. Maybe there's a balance somewhere?
Not sure which side you're on, if either, but pointing that out was so true it hurt. lol