Because compguy's global mode is wrongaP|Nelg wrote:How come theres a "forumus" on the authority whitelist when its not even a valid authority?
Ladle 103
Moderator: Light
- kyle
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:33 pm
- Location: Indiana, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe, Multiverse
- Contact:
Re: Ladle 103
Re: Ladle 103
Good games everyone! Had lots of fun and some of the best fights in a while.
Servers:
CT LIV: +1; good overall
Comp's NYC: +1; good too
Kyle's NYC: 0; Login took ages and I got some slides, not the worst though. Many thanks to Plee for the nice moderation though! (Plee: +1 )
P.S: Sorry for briefly messing up the brackets, got confused a bit. Thanks to whoever fixed that and I hope it didn't cause much trouble.
Servers:
CT LIV: +1; good overall
Comp's NYC: +1; good too
Kyle's NYC: 0; Login took ages and I got some slides, not the worst though. Many thanks to Plee for the nice moderation though! (Plee: +1 )
P.S: Sorry for briefly messing up the brackets, got confused a bit. Thanks to whoever fixed that and I hope it didn't cause much trouble.
- [Anonymous]
- Round Winner
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 11:54 am
Re: Ladle 103
You say that every Ladle you happy <clown>vov wrote:Good games everyone! Had lots of fun and some of the best fights in a while.
Last edited by Z-Man on Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: rrr
Reason: rrr
Re: Ladle 103
Gm's thanks hosters as usual, login did take a while for whatever reason
Kyles nyc +1
mvp -
Kyles nyc +1
mvp -
Re: Ladle 103
vov wrote:Good games everyone! Had lots of fun and some of the best fights in a while.
+1
Good games everyone.
Enjoyed it, Thanks to those in m&m who made the ladle enjoyable.
Vov, I do have to agree, some really good fights that ladle, might of been from the lack of ddosing
Re: Ladle 103
Dunno, seems to work fine for me. What were the specific problems?aP|Nelg wrote:How come theres a "forumus" on the authority whitelist when its not even a valid authority?
Edit: Recordings for 0.2.8.3.3:
final_kyle_mm_vs_dd.aarec 26696kb 2329s
u3_kyle_mm_vs_dd.aarec 26588kb 2636s
u2_ctliv_ct_vs_dd.aarec 18112kb 1948s
u2_kyle_saf_vs_mm.aarec 30760kb 4093s
u1_cgnyc_ww_vs_ct.aarec 13116kb 1883s
Re: Ladle 103
More recordings (rest of them edited into the previous post):
l2_cgger_saf_vs_ww.aarec 12136kb 1893s
l3_cgnyc_saf_vs_ct.aarec 9112kb 1241s
l4_cgnyc_dd_vs_ct.aarec 8920kb 1354s
l2_cgger_saf_vs_ww.aarec 12136kb 1893s
l3_cgnyc_saf_vs_ct.aarec 9112kb 1241s
l4_cgnyc_dd_vs_ct.aarec 8920kb 1354s
- kyle
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:33 pm
- Location: Indiana, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe, Multiverse
- Contact:
Re: Ladle 103
forumus Note the extra 'u' in itZ-Man wrote:Dunno, seems to work fine for me. What were the specific problems?aP|Nelg wrote:How come theres a "forumus" on the authority whitelist when its not even a valid authority?
Re: Ladle 103
Ah, /me is stupid.
Re: Ladle 103
You're welcomevov wrote: Many thanks to Plee for the nice moderation though! (Plee: +1 )
As for the ladle, I had fun. Sadly I'm still not changing my mind on double elimination making the ladle too long. At the end of the road half of my team has to leave. If I had extra subs it would be ideal, unfortunately ladle/tron seems to have it's dark moment.
Re: Ladle 103
But Ladle didn't take too long. It was on time and even finished earlier that I expected. Every team has commitment problems, but the missing teammates are not the result of double-elimination. I'm fairly sure all five teams were short players this Ladle. Personally, I really like the extra rounds. My team got to play three teams instead of one and it was a lot of fun.Plee wrote:Sadly I'm still not changing my mind on double elimination making the ladle too long. At the end of the road half of my team has to leave. If I had extra subs it would be ideal, unfortunately ladle/tron seems to have it's dark moment.