Ladle 74 Predictions
Moderator: Light
Re: Ladle 74 Predictions
Yeah orion was right. I think it's rather obvious a year means a calendar year.
Re: Ladle 74 Predictions
Take this to the ladle 74 no one cares statistics page this is PREDICTIONS or can none of you read? I mean really all everyone does is talk about how the prediction page always goes off topic. Way to be the number 1 contributors starting with over and his nit picking when I was obviously talking about only that matchup as I have hoax losing next round. So really start making predicts and stop bickering.
Re: Ladle 74 Predictions
No, it wasn't obvious, that's why I mentioned it. He said "Most ladle wins in one year." One year is the amount of time it takes to go around the sun. Where you start the journey is completely arbitrary. Even the calendar we use doesn't correspond to anything but an arbitrary date chosen by Pope Gregory XIII to fix issues he saw in the Julian calendar with the somewhat arbitrary Easter holiday decided by the whims of the First Council of Nicaea back in the year 325. But hey, go ahead and conform to the mental calendar that was handed to you, one of many calendars in the world.Soul wrote:I think it's rather obvious a year means a calendar year.

Re: Ladle 74 Predictions
I really am a bad predictor, but fine, let's make Loki happy.
Octa
<|fl vs ^\ 1-2
Both teams have weaknesses, but this one goes to BrilliantT.
IDWw vs CTB 0-2
;x Mac + Soska, nuff said
Quarter
/% vs ^\ 2-0
itz rd..
<|fi vs -`S: 2-0
I don't give them a match, I think <|fire can handle it.
_~R~_ vs .uNkfriends 1-2
idk this
CTB vs CTA 0-2
that's the reason why it's called A
Semi
/% vs <|fi 2-1
hopefully..
.uNkfriends vs CTA 1-2
both are good, maybe if uNk + friends had more ks friends.
Finals
/% vs CTA 1-2
boooring! Again and again these two battle, so I hope my predictions are bad.
Octa
<|fl vs ^\ 1-2
Both teams have weaknesses, but this one goes to BrilliantT.
IDWw vs CTB 0-2
;x Mac + Soska, nuff said
Quarter
/% vs ^\ 2-0
itz rd..
<|fi vs -`S: 2-0
I don't give them a match, I think <|fire can handle it.
_~R~_ vs .uNkfriends 1-2
idk this
CTB vs CTA 0-2
that's the reason why it's called A
Semi
/% vs <|fi 2-1
hopefully..
.uNkfriends vs CTA 1-2
both are good, maybe if uNk + friends had more ks friends.
Finals
/% vs CTA 1-2
boooring! Again and again these two battle, so I hope my predictions are bad.

Re: Ladle 74 Predictions
Yeah dude dont be so bitey I was just messing around :p But no you guys will still lose, thus leading to disbanding and starting MyM againSoul wrote:and it has been a pleasure tying/breaking all of their recordsgood turnout, I also think brilliant team will fare well this ladle, but we are at a point where if a team isnt more than 95% precise with there moves then thats game, the style of fortress is at a peak of its skill cap in regards to CT and RD , as it has been before (you all remember the mYm days, SP days, X clan, Anarchic warriors) all fortress Titans that can Can stay in finals for a vey long time.![]()
I love the girly part the best.J Dawg wrote:With all that said, RD should quit while they are ahead :p rd has been around since ladle 60 something, and blessed with players who are more than good enough to win. CT has had 7 years of power, overall ladle wins are impressive taking the fact that CT wasnt given talent like redemption. I find it amusing how rd says they are a top clan, yet out of 6 finals they have only won twice, and they only have beaten CT once since the Bowl season has started. that being said, in the limbo before bowl season rd was defeated again.
Clarification:
1.You do realize only the past two ladles have been part of this bowl season, correct?
2.We have made it to the last 5 finals, not 6 -- yet. So 2 wins out of last 5 finals. And looking through ladle results, i don't think ct ever came close to this?
You have some weird obsession with rd man, lay off
btw Rd is 5-2 against ct
gg nerds
----------------------
as a side note: Roter, that is the nicest post you've ever made on these forums

Plus, roter is plenty nice on rd forums too, people just aren't smart enough to get his jokes!





Re: Ladle 74 Predictions
You're so insecure it's hilarious. It says (2010) next to the team dimwit.sinewav wrote:No, it wasn't obvious, that's why I mentioned it. He said "Most ladle wins in one year." One year is the amount of time it takes to go around the sun. Where you start the journey is completely arbitrary. Even the calendar we use doesn't correspond to anything but an arbitrary date chosen by Pope Gregory XIII to fix issues he saw in the Julian calendar with the somewhat arbitrary Easter holiday decided by the whims of the First Council of Nicaea back in the year 325. But hey, go ahead and conform to the mental calendar that was handed to you, one of many calendars in the world.Soul wrote:I think it's rather obvious a year means a calendar year.
---------------------
Finals
Rd vs Unk
2-1
I think this could go either way depending on who has/hasn't been playing lately.
Re: Ladle 74 Predictions
Soul wrote: Finals
Rd vs Unk
2-1
I think this could go either way depending on who has/hasn't been playing lately.
Soul has been playing lately... gg.
- ElmosWorld
- Match Winner
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:38 pm
Re: Ladle 74 Predictions
Pretty sure that's better for unk.Gazelle wrote:Soul wrote: Finals
Rd vs Unk
2-1
I think this could go either way depending on who has/hasn't been playing lately.
Soul has been playing lately... gg.

Re: Ladle 74 Predictions
Lmfaoo, you're probably right.. But who are you playing for again?ElmosWorld wrote:Pretty sure that's better for unk.

- ElmosWorld
- Match Winner
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:38 pm
Re: Ladle 74 Predictions
No one. I'm busy today.Gazelle wrote:Lmfaoo, you're probably right.. But who are you playing for again?ElmosWorld wrote:Pretty sure that's better for unk.

Re: Ladle 74 Predictions






noobed it, delete
Last edited by Soul on Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ladle 74 Predictions
Apology accepted Soul.
More importantly I think we all know that if I was playing with rd or r it must have been an impersonator
gl to everyone playing
More importantly I think we all know that if I was playing with rd or r it must have been an impersonator
gl to everyone playing
Re: Ladle 74 Predictions
As usual, Soul has massive reading comprehension problems. First, what on god's green earth would I have to be insecure about? Second, Orion says 2010 after I posed the question. That is part of his clarification. I mean, jeez Soul the posts even have date stamps and you can't even read them.Soul wrote:You're so insecure it's hilarious. It says (2010) next to the team dimwit.

Re: Ladle 74 Predictions
Wrong. I was with Orion when we made the stats and the 2010 was there originally. Maybe YOU should review the date stampssinewav wrote:As usual, Soul has massive reading comprehension problems. First, what on god's green earth would I have to be insecure about? Second, Orion says 2010 after I posed the question. That is part of his clarification. I mean, jeez Soul the posts even have date stamps and you can't even read them.Soul wrote:You're so insecure it's hilarious. It says (2010) next to the team dimwit.

http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php? ... ldid=44768 I didn't know you were a time traveler sine
