Venijn wrote:Once again, you call me a kid. You're a very good debater, why you resort to childish name-calling is beyond me.
Don't judge me! That's my opinion, you can't say I'm wrong!
I call everyone "kids," including my friends and people older than me. It's like "guys" or "y'all." However, it does get extra usage and emphasis when applied to immature people or ideas, and I think that characterization rightly applies to you kids and your argument. Furthermore, as you might notice, it was plural, not singular. So I wasn't even referring specifically or directly to you in that paragraph, but broadly to the thread, to all those on the other side of the question to whom my comments apply, many of whom are in fact kids. So, get the hell over it.
But hey, good job not replying to the content of what I said...again.
PokeMaster wrote:Phytotron in the Ladle 35 Date Poll wrote:a lot of Americans do get together for the holiday, for cookouts and other events (festivals, concerts, fireworks), whatever. So, it would seem poor scheduling for a competition that would involve a number of Americans, just from a practical standpoint.
Not to say that you had a strong opinion back then, but I'm wondering why it has suddenly changed?
Ouch, you got me! Oh, wait, you didn't. My opinion hasn't changed. Read the very post you quoted and
this post more carefully. Granted, I could have phrased it more clearly in the second instance, but I was trying to brief. Notice the distinction I draw? "You can miss a Ladle, or you can miss a ball game; they're both matters of fun, not reverence." A ball game, no matter how big or culturally significant, does not meet the standard of reverence that is due a national holiday along the lines of Independence Day, or an equivalent. I would be more sympathetic to giving consideration to such occasions. Of course, if you all want to go down that road, then you're going to have to make another rule or voting every month or whatever. Who and what events count and why? Do you want to do go down that road? I thought you all had decided some time ago not to do that.
But you're talking about a sporting event. And, look, I get it. I know sports can be "important" to people, including as a big cultural event. I live in a part of a country where basketball, and in a city where UofL specifically, is like a religion. In the south people live and breath football. Have you ever seen an American movie about small town high school football and what it means to those people? Joke break.
So, yes, we do get how big soccer is to you over there. But here's the thing. If my team were playing in the national championship, I would skip Ladle in a heartbeat. Hell, I wouldn't even play the Ladle through the fall and winter because I like watching the NFL on Sundays. Not just the games, but we go over to my wife's parents' house and make a day of it.
"Yeah, but there are a lot of us." Big deal. I repeat: "You can miss a Ladle, or you can miss a ball game; they're both matters of fun, not reverence." Make your choice which you can or can't live without. I would think the obvious choice would be the UEFA championship over the triviality that is the Ladle. To again repeat: "Ladle will survive without you kids, and you'll survive without it. It's one (meaningless) game that will be repeated in just another month; that's no time. Ladle has been going on ad nauseum for years. One month without you will not hurt it one trifle, and one month without it will not hurt you one trifle. If it really would be so damaging to any of your blessed little hearts or fragile psyches to miss one little video game, you need to stop playing video games. Now." I'm dead serious with that last sentence.
þsy wrote:it's NOT the event that is important - it is the number that are busy as a result ... This is not about the sport/event/occasion, it is about the numbers and level of participation!
That's not the main argument I've seen. And, besides, so what? This is an informal video game tournament. There are never the same number of people playing; hell, there will probably be more participants than in several earlier Ladles. And it'll be repeated next month! Why are you so up in a tizzy about it? "People will miss us! We're too important!" They'll be fine. Go have your fun with the ball game. Hopefully you'll get out into the fresh air and socialize with some real people. This game will still be here when you get back.
Venijn wrote:Again, I think this community is a different one to that, I've said this before. It's bigger now, and there are many more involved now, that weren't 2 years ago.
Untrue.
PokeMaster wrote:Holding a grudge for the past is childish.
It's not about a grudge. It's about principles and double-standards.
pickle wrote:Quote on Quote "Ladle.2"
Oh my god. The phrase is "quote, unquote." It's an expression used exclusively in speech to indicate that the subsequent phrase would be surrounded by quotation marks were it written. The fact that you're writing and actually putting those quotation marks in for us all to see plain as day makes using that expression totally redundant. Come on, people, you can do better.