J Dawg wrote:Losing some Key players from revolver doesnt make them as solid as I think but Hey there just incredible biased decisions and I for one share cronix's dream of cta and b playing in finals
hmm well, I'd always be a fan of raising the quality of the videos, but if it were to become standard for people to make and publish their own, you couldn't realistically have much quality control other than setting good examples (as you've done already). Anywho, this is a discussion for another thread.
Good job on the video Concord, t'was a good watch. Of course, bit too over-analytical for my taste but that kind of video has to be.
constructive'ish feedback: more arrows/drawing! the stuff you drew were good and lifted the experience of watching the video a lot. So, more of that :D
Darn you Concord. You told me "you're not going to win" before the ladle, I know, but isn't it a bit much to stay on 20 points in that final match just to make me lose a prediction
√30 Matches played √2 Matches won by teams that did not win a [game] in Ladle 55 √Less than an hour difference between scheduled time for the beginning of the Final and actual time. √6 or less Games played in American servers (haven't looked it up, but it's max 6 even if none of the scheduled US matches moved to EU.) √0 Lost Matches by the Ladle winning team. ?Less than 5501 Total Points Scored in all matches - In 30 matches, 5500 total is 183 average. That's at least 100-80 on average. Yeah I doubt it seeing as many uneven matches end 100-20~40 and that heavily affects the average overall. Possible I'm wrong there though. × 22 or more points scored by the high scoring player in the Finals (per match) - first Woned got 22+, then Concord got 20.
well, first off, you bet over on the number of losses the winner would have, and secondly there were 4 matches won by teams that didn't win any matches last month.
the average for Revolver's matches was 183 exactly. I have no clue if that's representative of the ladle on the whole or not.
Concord wrote:well, first off, you bet over on the number of losses the winner would have, and secondly there were 4 matches won by teams that didn't win any matches last month.
Oh crap, haha. For #1 that was a misclick of some sort* then and for #2, I misread it or thought ladle 55 was this ladle, haha! I read it as "2.5 Matches won by teams that did not win any games this ladle". Oh well, my bad. Should've paid attention
*I'm positive that I was predicting a clean sweep by the winners.
J Dawg wrote:Losing some Key players from revolver doesnt make them as solid as I think but Hey there just incredible biased decisions and I for one share cronix's dream of cta and b playing in finals
Ikr.. Well as i can say her predictions were slightly off knowing that unk didnt win a round agaisnt R and ctb beating pure luck and tx losing to cta.. i think she just doesnt like ct
J Dawg wrote:Ikr.. Well as i can say her predictions were slightly off knowing that unk didnt win a round agaisnt R and ctb beating pure luck and tx losing to cta.. i think she just doesnt like ct
J Dawg wrote:Ikr.. Well as i can say her predictions were slightly off knowing that unk didnt win a round agaisnt R and ctb beating pure luck and tx losing to cta.. i think she just doesnt like ct
-made by az95
