
Ladle 53
Moderator: Light
Re: Ladle 53
For the record, MB53's chatbot is a better center than MB53. It has a 100% winning record against me 

- ElmosWorld
- Match Winner
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:38 pm
Re: Ladle 53
There's no way to prove that they are bots and not humans that are just afk the entire match.
It's not like there's not and easy way to beat it. Just hole his defense... Its not like he can attack or you need a defense.
It's not like there's not and easy way to beat it. Just hole his defense... Its not like he can attack or you need a defense.

- INW
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Re: Ladle 53
It is a waste of time for the team that should have a bye to the next round.ElmosWorld wrote:There's no way to prove that they are bots and not humans that are just afk the entire match.
It's not like there's not and easy way to beat it. Just hole his defense... Its not like he can attack or you need a defense.
And you really think 5 people are going to join a ladle server and go afk?
Proof: IP's. omg. chase solved.
Re: Ladle 53
Technically, it's not even against the official rules. It's just in bad taste.ElmosWorld wrote:There's no way to prove that they are bots and not humans that are just afk the entire match.

I, personally, would tolerate this team for the same reason I tolerate magglass1's hacked client: it's beatable. But I'm not the entire community. And besides, how would you all feel if you were joining a competition for a chance to play against the toughest of the toughest, only to find your first round is against a bunch of bots, something you can face in single player mode?ElmosWorld also wrote:It's not like there's not and easy way to beat it. Just hole his defense... Its not like he can attack or you need a defense.
That being said, if RoadRunnerZ wants to face off a bot team in their first round, or they don't care either way, then so be it. It's not this ladle that I'm worried about so much as ladles in general.
- INW
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Re: Ladle 53
The word "player" is implied to be a person...so yea, it is breaking the rules...
btw, the CT's USA server is down
btw, the CT's USA server is down
- INW
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Re: Ladle 53
The word "player" is implied to be a person...so yea, it is breaking the rules...
btw, the CT's USA server is down
btw, the CT's USA server is down
Re: Ladle 53
INW wrote:The word "player" is implied to be a person...so yea, it is breaking the rules...
Exactly my thoughts.INW wrote: It is a waste of time for the team that should have a bye to the next round.
And you really think 5 people are going to join a ladle server and go afk?
Proof: IP's. omg. chase solved.
Don't underestimate the chat bots though. Whatever, Cody's won't be as good as yours, INW

- ElmosWorld
- Match Winner
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:38 pm
Re: Ladle 53
So people from the same IP aren't allowed to play in a ladle (radian and viper come to mind)INW wrote:ElmosWorld wrote:
Proof: IP's. omg. chase solved.

- INW
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Re: Ladle 53
False. I can play with my brother in the other room.ElmosWorld wrote:So people from the same IP aren't allowed to play in a ladle (radian and viper come to mind)INW wrote:ElmosWorld wrote:
Proof: IP's. omg. chase solved.
I think they changed the setting when I brought it up. The same enemies ip setting was at default 0 and should always be set to 1 for the ladle.
And ya, liz took that video off youtube for some reason

Re: Ladle 53
Cody's team, as presently constituted, is not better than a team full of real players.
Therefore, no other teams are injured by Cody's actions.
Therefore, no other teams are injured by Cody's actions.
Re: Ladle 53
Yeah, I don't see a problem with it either.
Re: Ladle 53
just a waste of time??
Re: Ladle 53
it'll take ten minutes.
and, that's a bad argument, because if he found players, no one would complain, and it would take at least as much time.
and, that's a bad argument, because if he found players, no one would complain, and it would take at least as much time.
-
- Match Winner
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:36 am
Re: Ladle 53
it's a good argument if for whatever reason multiple players decided to do this and then started wasting time for multiple teams

















Re: Ladle 53
If I were Cody, I'd generate all this hype about my team being a bunch of bots, then show up with some actual players and do damage. That'd be much fun 

