Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

owned · Post by **owned** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:50 am

The reason I like big holes is they speed up the game. With small holes, sometimes you need to adjust twice to get in, but with big ones you can always get in with just one adjustment.

sinewav · Post by **sinewav** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 1:38 am

Yep. I thought that was a good idea too. It was rejected.

http://forums3.armagetronad.net/viewtop ... 88#p224388

wap · Post by **wap** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:01 am

edit: nvm

That's why I like small holes better, it requires some skills to get in, instead of those big holes you almost can't miss.

Olive · Post by **Olive** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:04 am

That are two adjustments.

wap · Post by **wap** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:06 am

ah whatever, but i still dislike big holes.

I mean, it takes not even one second extra to get in?

Gonzap · Post by **Gonzap** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:50 am

IF you manage to get in

wap · Post by **wap** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:36 am

Yeah but don't you like a little challenge? It doesn't have to be too easy IMO.

Slov · Post by **Slov** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:33 pm

yeah it's always fun trying to get into small holes

Mkay1 · Post by **Mkay1** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 2:06 pm

Especially at 60 speed while trying to enter the defense.

Slov · Post by **Slov** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 2:07 pm

exactly

sinewav · Post by **sinewav** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 4:09 pm

I want everyone to get another look at this amendment to make sure it's OK with everyone. I don't think we need to vote on it since people are just looking for clarification. I added a bit about "asking the other team" to provide more flexibility.

sinewav wrote:"A team may add a maximum of 2 substitutes to replace missing players. No substitutes may be added after the quarter finals without the approval of the opponent. The substitute must not have played for another team that day."

Do we really have to vote on team size and holes? It's not a big deal, I just don't think it's going to change...

Team Size: 6v6 | 7v7
Hole Size: Small | Classic (2.0m)

syllabear · Post by **syllabear** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 4:26 pm

I'd change the second vote to

Hole Size: Current | Bigger (Up to/including 2.0m)

And I don't think anyone wants holes bigger than 2.0m

gawdzilla · Post by **gawdzilla** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 4:35 pm

why would you want to "speed up" gameplay? i'd rather have a long round where you need to win by skill / surviving rather than making a hole, easily getting in because its huge and then slowly ganking

i'd rather play sumo then

anyway i'm fine with what you said sinewav

Desolate · Post by **Desolate** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 4:37 pm

I always thought Corn's hole size would be a good one to try, but no one really expressed interest or tested it.

Concord · Post by **Concord** » Sat Oct 23, 2010 4:50 pm

seems like change for change's sake. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Armagetron Forums

Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion

Re: Ladle 39 Voting Discussion