goody frowns on you
Moderator: Light
-
- Round Winner
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:39 am
goody frowns on you
at first i wasn't too bothered by the team switch
but the utter lack of remorse is troubling
if the responsible parties don't know what they did was wrong (their behaviour indicates they want us to believe this) then what's to stop something like this happening again?
sure a rule...but they can just find a new way to exploit the system
is punishment necessary to deter future would-be bad behavers?
edit: oops, can a mod move this to competition section, please?
but the utter lack of remorse is troubling
if the responsible parties don't know what they did was wrong (their behaviour indicates they want us to believe this) then what's to stop something like this happening again?
sure a rule...but they can just find a new way to exploit the system
is punishment necessary to deter future would-be bad behavers?
edit: oops, can a mod move this to competition section, please?
Well...I did.
Re: goody frowns on you
There are two topics about this already and probably more to come so this isn't really neccesary. I do agree we need a voting for the next ladle, again, though.
Re: goody frowns on you
Hey you! Get off my lawn!!!
Re: goody frowns on you
He really doesn't care.PsYkO wrote:Hey you! Get off my lawn!!!
Olive a.k.a ZeMu, MoonFlower & chicken.
Re: goody frowns on you
I care less. Hence, my post. Sorry, didn't think I had to make it even more obvious.Olive wrote:He really doesn't care.PsYkO wrote:Hey you! Get off my lawn!!!
- DDMJ
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1882
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 12:15 am
- Location: LA, CA, USA, NA
- Contact:
Re: goody frowns on you
The whole "team switching places in the bracket" thing has happened before. Rico swapped |x| with some other team so they could be on the easier side of the bracket without asking the team that he swapped. It was frowned on then and this behavior is still frowned on now.
If the teams hadn't been switched, SP would have been playing a fresh CT team rather than one that had just gone through 2 grueling matches vs. TX.
For historical purposes I say we call it Ladle 36* (with an asterisk).
If the teams hadn't been switched, SP would have been playing a fresh CT team rather than one that had just gone through 2 grueling matches vs. TX.
For historical purposes I say we call it Ladle 36* (with an asterisk).
Re: goody frowns on you
Yea and I guess we opted to play an easier team. Seriously when was TX ever a challenge? GTFO. Who the **** thinks we swapped to make things easier for ourselves? We done it purely to send KOD/IB ect home packing early. Enough with your stupid claims. Stick to the obvious.
- Desolate
- Shutout Match Winner
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:31 pm
- Location: Probably golfing
Re: goody frowns on you
The ladles, and bowl tx has won weren't a challenge? Even before the combination, both tr and x were definitely considered challenges. We were even a challenge to you when sp had its 3 ladle winning streak. We won one match 100-26 or something like that. That wasn't challenge enough for you? I didn't really give a shit about the switch until you decided to redirect the flame in our direction.
Re: goody frowns on you
This is exactly why that poll will be skewed. Too much bias.Desolate wrote: I didn't really give a shit about the switch until you decided to redirect the flame in our direction.
Re: goody frowns on you
Yes, you didn't, but two or three of your members do and their argument is that we didn't get a chance to play TX and that meant everything. Not to me.Desolate wrote:The ladles, and bowl tx has won weren't a challenge? Even before the combination, both tr and x were definitely considered challenges. We were even a challenge to you when sp had its 3 ladle winning streak. We won one match 100-26 or something like that. That wasn't challenge enough for you? I didn't really give a shit about the switch until you decided to redirect the flame in our direction.
- DDMJ
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1882
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 12:15 am
- Location: LA, CA, USA, NA
- Contact:
Re: goody frowns on you
Looks like someone ego is so big that it's blocking his vision; he can't even see the truth.Flex wrote:Yea and I guess we opted to play an easier team. Seriously when was TX ever a challenge? GTFO.
To say we've never been a challenge is first of all not true and secondly very rude and harsh. Even if we completely sucked, which I believe we don't (someone back me up on this please), you still shouldn't come out and say that.
I never really had a lot of respect for you, but now you've taken it too far.
However, despite all of this, I"m just letting you know (Flex), that I voted against banning you.
Re: goody frowns on you
durka, what flex said is really no worse than what goody said. plus and ww both are good clans too, im not defending the switch, but there isnt much of an arguement it was easier for us in my eyes.
also since when is it tough sitting 4 hrs a computer
, you dont need that much endurance to sit up and press keys!
oh and ill back you up and say you dont suck
edit: plus is not a clan, rrather a team
also since when is it tough sitting 4 hrs a computer

oh and ill back you up and say you dont suck
edit: plus is not a clan, rrather a team

Re: goody frowns on you
-*inS*- wrote:also since when is it tough sitting 4 hrs a computer, you dont need that much endurance to sit up and press keys!

There is a light-hearted joke about your defense and the lack of work it involves, but I'm not feeling clever enough to deliver it without sounding mean-spirited.
