orion wrote:i was the leader of the team, then i say sorry if you need it. but you have to understand we won this beating all and lossing only 1 match 100-94.
That was the worst, most insincere apology I've ever hear. You just made things worse. If you really believed it was "just a game," then you wouldn't have switched teams after the brackets were finalized.
Also, you're not a leader. You're Flex's dog. There. I said it. Sorry if it hurts your feelings, but you must understand it's just a game, right?
a game dont make me nothing np.. if u understand bad what i said well np.. if u think im the dog of flex, i think he is my leader, leader of sp generally but np...
orion wrote:i was the leader of the team, then i say sorry if you need it. but you have to understand we won this beating all and lossing only 1 match 100-94.
i only hope you matture and understand its only a game. the only good post i saw is the Olive`s post...
who understand that its just a game, not neccesary fight. we will try to not ofend nothing next ladle
now pls stop it
By the way its looking, You,Flex and some other SP are BANNED next ladle.
uh, then open team will win this
some questions:
am i the first on edit wiki wrong?
flex is multicaptain? where i never saw him as captain.
flex have to be banned for add 2 teams? hmmm is the only one who did it?
you cody banned me automatically? hmm then i ban you XD
see you
Sine.wav: personal attacks aren't required here, please refrain from such immaturity. If you believe this will set a precedent, then by all means make a rule. I look at ladle 35 and the alias controversy, it appears you made a vote and now we have authed ladles, I don't see anyone punished for that?
Crimson King: Whoever you are, I have no respect for an account created yesterday that has more than half it's posts pertaining to sp. You are just someone afraid to post with your real name and try to attack me in game during the ladle.
Cody: I'm not sure I follow you? Firstly you have no case for banning me, and secondly banning flex/Orion won't solve anything. In fact it will make this situation worse.
Finally, I am disapointed with the way people have responded to this. Instead of constructive fix XYZ, I hear let's ban XYZ. Why? Will that fix what has happened? Is that what you want to satisfy you sense of "justice". Fact is, this won't change the past, only perhaps decrease compatition for the next ladle.
orion wrote:i was the leader of the team, then i say sorry if you need it. but you have to understand we won this beating all and lossing only 1 match 100-94.
i only hope you matture and understand its only a game. the only good post i saw is the Olive`s post...
who understand that its just a game, not neccesary fight. we will try to not ofend nothing next ladle
now pls stop it
ins, calm down. It's just a game! Who cares if we break the rules and then insult eachother?
i think we all know what we did wrong what no... and i know personaly i dont have to edit again wiki bcs you will blame me forever. i really need not play a ladle for that? is it a big problem?
or i have other idea, the organizers: sinewav, freekill, kyle, durka, zmans and idk who more.. can create page where you are the only able to edit it, like pbworks.
if i edited wiki was bcs i tought this team had no players, i dont think im bad by that, if im bad the i delete it everytime :S
pointing out that you were switching to play a harder team is irrelevant. the point is that switching to play a harder team also makes it permissible to switch and play an easier team. for example, no one points out the advantage Orion's team gained from the switch. no one expected them to win, but that should also be noted since advantages were given.
sp tries so hard. as if just having two teams isnt enough of an advantage in da ladle
my post was not a complaint about your win, but actually the opposite. win or loss and independent of the team(s) concerned or buffoon involved (flex), disciplinary actions should be taken the same (if the ladle has them yet).
.
