Ladle 28 | discussion topic

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply
gawdzilla
Liz of the many names
Posts: 1124
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:13 am

Ladle 28 | discussion topic

Post by gawdzilla »

Ladle 28, 6th of December!

Is there anything we need to look at for this ladle? Things to vote on, etc? Or the same as last?

This ladle is going to be very interesting, so far.

degree°Clan's debut, will we deliver?
~*SpeederS*~ aka SpArrow
Twi¦×¦ted ¦×¦ats who almost got beaten by VcL, will they get past the first round?
PLZ RES US! ..are slash and freako gonna leave pRu after this ladle?
The Usual Suspects, the return of Kod!
Immortal Dynasty, will they all cry lag and disconnect as usual?

There is still time to sign up, for those who haven't.

http://ladle.ath.cx/

:)
Last edited by gawdzilla on Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Top
User avatar
Cosmic Dolphin
Round Winner
Posts: 377
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 4:03 pm
Location: Ecuador

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by Cosmic Dolphin »

Are you like trying to be an announcer, talking like that?
" Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something."
-Plato
Ok, but why did I add this signature? I was like 15 and thought I was smart? What a brat.
Top
User avatar
Cody <3
Match Winner
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:08 am
Location: Indiana

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by Cody <3 »

Def super gays and crazy cowboys got this! we will be in the semi finals! mark thy words!
NEW 1v1 Sumo SB Tournament SITE
http://1v1sb.weebly.com
Top
User avatar
kyle
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1975
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:33 pm
Location: Indiana, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe, Multiverse
Contact:
Contact kyle

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by kyle »

we just looked at the topics for concern for the last ladle. which before i thought we would do that about every 3 ladles. However we may want to have a vote for this one to discuss the bad admin command usage.
Image
Top
User avatar
compguygene
Adjust Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 2346
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Contact:
Contact compguygene

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by compguygene »

kyle wrote:we just looked at the topics for concern for the last ladle. which before i thought we would do that about every 3 ladles. However we may want to have a vote for this one to discuss the bad admin command usage.
Agreed. We are only supposed to vote every three ladles. I do think we should address the potential badadmin problem. If we don't, we are liable to have somebody do something bad, because we didn't establish some sort of rule.
Armagetron: It's a video game that people should just play and enjoy :)
https://bit.ly/2KBGYjvCheck out the simple site about TheServerPharm
Top
User avatar
MrsKsr
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 807
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:37 am
Location: Paris
Contact:
Contact MrsKsr

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by MrsKsr »

Didn't you pass a [stupid] vote to have only admins and no team leaders last ladle? So if those people you elected as trustworthy are said admins, what's the problem?
"You may say I'm a dreamer but I'm not the only one;
I hope some day you will join us, and the world can live as one"

“Too often we underestimate the power of a touch, a smile, a kind word, a listening ear, an honest compliment, or the smallest act of caring, all of which have the potential to turn a life around.”

I believe that to truly love is the ultimate expression of the will to live.
Top
LucK
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 861
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:04 pm

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by LucK »

Why don't the people who run the servers set the access level to kill at "Owner" that way no admins can abuse it. Correct me if I'm wrong but there is no reason to /admin kill anyone during a Fort match.
Top
User avatar
theroze
Match Winner
Posts: 596
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:30 am
Location: 47 72 69 64

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by theroze »

LucK wrote:Why don't the people who run the servers set the access level to kill at "Owner" that way no admins can abuse it. Correct me if I'm wrong but there is no reason to /admin kill anyone during a Fort match.
Agreed. There are a few admins who think they can "help" their team by adminkilling the other team. Armagetron is a friendly game (except killing), and you should be happy that we can have a game like this.
apparition wrote:You being able to kill so many players that quickly and efficiently is evidence that the community skill level must be dropping... Sad :/
Reigning champion of: Sir-spam-a-lot 2011
Top
User avatar
Z-Man
God & Project Admin
Posts: 11717
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Cologne
Contact:
Contact Z-Man

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by Z-Man »

LucK wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong but there is no reason to /admin kill anyone during a Fort match.
Well, the (now fixed) bug where people would get stuck on walls forever instead of getting killed would come to mind. Fact is, those who want to admin a match need certain commands and those are all potentially dangerous.
Top
User avatar
compguygene
Adjust Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 2346
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Contact:
Contact compguygene

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by compguygene »

Z-Man wrote:
LucK wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong but there is no reason to /admin kill anyone during a Fort match.
Well, the (now fixed) bug where people would get stuck on walls forever instead of getting killed would come to mind. Fact is, those who want to admin a match need certain commands and those are all potentially dangerous.
My thoughts exactly. I really think that making the penalty appropriately harsh will take care of the problem. The problem really can't be necessarily solved by server owners. For instance, although my wife knows that I plan to be available for every ladle, life happens. I try to ensure that a few others in tron have owner access as well if I am not around. But, with some careful planning on my part, my servers have been around for 3 Ladles that I could not attend. Part of what makes that work is proper setup and planning on my part. But, the other part is other people being able to execute the commands necessary to admin things. Therefore, I have to concur that admins need access to "dangerous" commands.
Armagetron: It's a video game that people should just play and enjoy :)
https://bit.ly/2KBGYjvCheck out the simple site about TheServerPharm
Top
gawdzilla
Liz of the many names
Posts: 1124
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:13 am

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by gawdzilla »

What are you people on about anyways? Have we ever had a situation where someone with invalid reasons started adminkilling the opposing team..? I'd assume none of the people who are participating in the ladle are that moronic.

Luck, is VcL going to be in the ladle? I heard something about it, if not then make work of it. :)
Top
LucK
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 861
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:04 pm

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by LucK »

You heard right Liz :)

compguygene talked us into joining the ladle so we will see u guys there :)

Question- Ok when i try to add Rajinn's Global ID it won't let me because he has characters like -=. in it so is there anyway i can still add it?
Top
gawdzilla
Liz of the many names
Posts: 1124
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:13 am

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by gawdzilla »

Why not have TaZ and Codehunter on the roster too? Ninja and Fight are no regular fort players. C'mon, bring out your best players and do your best.
Top
LucK
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 861
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:04 pm

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by LucK »

Rajinn is codehunter lol and TaZ hasn't said if he could play or not yet.
Top
owned
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 876
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Ladle 28 | discussion topic | general

Post by owned »

On the Ladle page, (http://wiki.armagetronad.net/index.php? ... enge_Board) it shows two different times for the rounds on the bracket and on the time chart. I assume we're going by the top one?
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Competitions”