Ladle 27 Voting | Status: Closed

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

User avatar
orion
Match Winner
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Ladle 27 Voting | Status: open

Post by orion »

18:45 GTM
moderators: team leaders
doble elimination: none!


when ill stay the brackets?
Image
Hoax
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 892
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 5:24 pm
Location: UK

Re: Ladle 27 Voting | Status: open

Post by Hoax »

You can only vote if you're playing..
What happened to ID?
User avatar
orion
Match Winner
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Ladle 27 Voting | Status: open

Post by orion »

ok sorry
Image
User avatar
kyle
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1963
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:33 pm
Location: Indiana, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe, Multiverse
Contact:

Re: Ladle 27 Voting | Status: Closed

Post by kyle »

The outcome
  • Moderators - Global(4) | Team Leaders(1) | Both(3)
  • start time - 17:45 GMT (2) | 18:45 GMT (6)
  • Double Elimination - None (6) | Light (2) | Full (0)

but as woned pointed out i think that first question may have mislead a few, I think the majority would agree on adding the global admins.
Image
User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6472
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle 27 Voting | Status: Closed

Post by sinewav »

kyle wrote:I think the majority would agree on adding the global admins.
:wink: They did agree, haha.
:? Now we just have to figure out who to appoint.

We didn't really go into too much detail on this. How many do we need? 4? It seems like Team_Leader should still have some authority (to start a match at least) in case there is no global mod for that server.
User avatar
kyle
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1963
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:33 pm
Location: Indiana, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe, Multiverse
Contact:

Re: Ladle 27 Voting | Status: Closed

Post by kyle »

i also don't think much of this can happen today, so for now keep team leaders with what they have.

the main talk was z-man covering a few servers and compguygene some others
compguygene wrote:
Z-Man wrote:I never had technical problems with too many running clients. If it's low-intensity admining and there's no simultaneous fires to put, watching over two or three servers at once are an efficient use of time.
Same here, I routinely run 2-3 clients on my wife's computer. It probably helps that it has a 24" monitor, 4gb ram and a quad-core amd phenom. I would imagine that z-man and I could easily cover 4-6 servers between the 2 of us.
Image
User avatar
Desolate
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 1021
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Probably golfing

Re: Ladle 27 Voting | Status: Closed

Post by Desolate »

In case there are not enough global moderators, my plans for today got canceled so I would happily help out if needed
User avatar
INW
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1950
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA

Re: Ladle 27 Voting | Status: open

Post by INW »

Hoax wrote:What happened to ID?
i know the ladle already happened but for clarification, we didnt have enough players at the time..we are working on that though for the next ladle :)
User avatar
Corn1
Core Dumper
Posts: 124
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:53 pm

Re: Ladle 27 Voting | Status: Closed

Post by Corn1 »

sinewav wrote:
kyle wrote:I think the majority would agree on adding the global admins.
:wink: They did agree, haha.
No,
It was a plurality not a majority.
User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6472
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle 27 Voting | Status: Closed

Post by sinewav »

:| Oh, good point. My bad.
Post Reply