Armagetron Forums

Thanks. Looks accurate now.

EDIT: list was fixed Kyle, the activity list you posted doesn't seem like its accurate. The difference between the 4th ranked server (|FA| Fortress!) and the last server on the list is only 10, which seems highly unlikely since the first 3 servers were separated by thousands of player counts and the...

Good Fork! Final results can be viewed here.

Match times have been added for all remaining matches. Check the bracket for updates.

Brackets are up (match times pending) and can be found at http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php/Fork#Bracket

I was going to post this in the thread, but it was locked right as I was about to do it. I'd like to add in my final thoughts, and suggest that the community takes a few notes. Take note of how Zman said that he would lock this thread, but gave no actual reason for doing so Take note of how as soon ...

Honestly, that just makes it easier to evade and break them. How so? The rules are already clearly not enforceable (remember how the last rule says that "these rules might be wrong" and "dont rule lawyer"?) and the more concise it is, the harder it is to get around it. Are you s...

Durf has gotten a chance to defend himself. Incorrect. Look at my post about Zman and Tanks warning. He did not get a chance to defend himself. He would have been banned if he did. Its getting a little tiring when you keep on repeating your points after I've already invalidated them. If you aren't ...

You keep calling it "defending himself", but he was the attacker here. Z-Man said it perfectly fine. If you can simply walk away, attacking is not self defense. So you're saying Durf shouldn't have a chance to defend himself? Even the worst, most obvious criminals get to have a fair trial...

In response to people saying how Durf had a chance to explain himself: Zmans warning about the ban: http://forums3.armagetronad.net/viewtopic.php?p=292217#p292217 Tanks warning about the ban: http://forums3.armagetronad.net/viewtopic.php?p=292374#p292374 You say Durf had a chance to explain himself,...

Appeal to popularity isn't going to be a proper call for you here. We're not talking about factual things, but ideas and feelings. Why are we talking about feelings and not facts? This is supposed to be an evidence based discussion. Also if you weren’t trying to legitimize/justify the moderator's d...

Yes, we did,... The threat was made after the events in the original ban thread, meaning it was impossible to say how this specific threat is unjust if it hadn’t even been made yet. The threat happening on and affecting Tanks property does not automatically make the threat unjustified, so you would...

As far as Durf goes, people seem to generally agree for the most part. There's the few of you that want to make Durf more right than he ever was, but mostly people agree he should be given a chance to come back. Most of us also agree that we don't want this stuff here arguing about how right or wro...

Dude. You remind… So you’re criticizing me for using evidence (the dictionary) to show what people’s words actually mean? This is a discussion based on evidence and logic. If you don’t support the use of evidence, then I suggest you go elsewhere. In this scenario, the teacher is the authority figur...

If you are trying to prove that the rules are too vague...the rest of us accept them. Doesn't matter who accepts them. Its unjust to punish someone for something they couldn't have known they did wrong due to the rules being terrible. If you are trying to say that Durf either didn't threaten to hac...