New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply
bebad
On Lightcycle Grid
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:33 am

New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)

Post by bebad »

Hello

Let's do a ladle!

Sign up here ! ---> http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php/ ... enge_Board




Based on positive feedback during ladle 111, we've decided to use the New fort settings :_)

Here's a link to the wiki page about Newfort settings --> http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php?title=Newfort

Here are some of the differences between fort and newfort
• Modified map

• Rim Acceleration (cycle_accel_rim 1.3)

• Losing points after holing (score_hole -2)

• Cycle tails are shorter (walls_length 395)

• 5v5 instead of 6v6 (team_max_players 5


Discord --> https://discordapp.com/channels/3739372 ... 5117284352

User avatar
kyle
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1833
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:33 pm
Location: Indiana, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe, Multiverse
Contact:

Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)

Post by kyle »

I was curious about the settings change, so I looked it up, Beside the map / resource repository change
CYCLE_ACCEL_RIM changed from 0 to 1.3 (I think CTWF was 1.1 on most maps)
WALLS_LENGTH changed from 400 to 395
SCORE_HOLE changed from 0 to -2
(SP_)TEAM_MAX_PLAYERS changed from 6 to 5
(SP_)TEAM_MAX_IMBALANCE changed from 6 to 5

Additionally
SPAM_MAXLEN changed from 150 to 200 (You can now say more)
ACCESS_LEVEL_OP changed from 2 to 6
(SP_)SIZE_FACTOR changed from 0 to 8
(SP_)LIMIT_ROUNDS changed from 2020 to 1933
SP_LIMIT_TIME changed from 30 to 21600
and the comment for WIN_ZONE_RANDOMNESS was removed
Image

Vogue
Match Winner
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:50 pm

Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)

Post by Vogue »

hello who wants to be in my team

User avatar
Titanoboa
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:07 pm

Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)

Post by Titanoboa »

Nice! Let's get some more teams signed up.

User avatar
aP|Nelg
Match Winner
Posts: 550
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 10:22 pm
Contact:

Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)

Post by aP|Nelg »

Ladle 112 authorities are up. Server owners should update their configs.

http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php? ... rd#Servers

User avatar
Z-Man
God & Project Admin
Posts: 11240
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Cologne, Jabber: [email protected]
Contact:

Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)

Post by Z-Man »

Recordings:
final_12345_vs_classic.aarec 14372kb 1619s
semi_classic_vs_newbornkittens.aarec 17088kb 1992s
semi_rt_vs_12345.aarec 23332kb 2347s
kyle wrote:
Thu Mar 26, 2020 2:55 am
(SP_)LIMIT_ROUNDS changed from 2020 to 1933
Yeah, about that... can we change it back, please? It's insignificant to gameplay, and the value 2020 was honoring the forum member mostly responsible for creating this tournament format. I'm sure the real reason is something innocent, but without context, and there is none given, 1933 looks like we're celebrating German Nazi's rise to power. To be clear, I'm not offended. I just don't want to attract those who might like that idea.

User avatar
Titanoboa
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:07 pm

Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)

Post by Titanoboa »

ggs! Thanks to everyone who played and all server donors who made it possible. It was fun!
Z-Man wrote:
Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:41 pm
Yeah, about that... can we change it back, please? It's insignificant to gameplay, and the value 2020 was honoring the forum member mostly responsible for creating this tournament format. I'm sure the real reason is something innocent, but without context, and there is none given, 1933 looks like we're celebrating German Nazi's rise to power. To be clear, I'm not offended. I just don't want to attract those who might like that idea.
Thanks for noticing, and I second that motion.


A couple of footnotes:

Teams "Ampz" and "Team FoFo" were impromptu teams, formed last-minute and added to the brackets in post. That explains the imbalanced brackets, which is an after-construction. Their team names and player lists may need revision.

"Ampz" played a best of 3 against _~Rogue Tronners~_ in the semifinal slot (result: 2-0), but as far as I know we don't have a protocol for semi-double-elimination, so we have decided together that we'll remember that match as an unofficial friendly.

User avatar
Z-Man
God & Project Admin
Posts: 11240
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Cologne, Jabber: [email protected]de
Contact:

Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)

Post by Z-Man »

Ah, sorry for missing the recording. I didn't pay full attention to the action on the servers or the Discord chat.

User avatar
Titanoboa
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1745
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:07 pm

Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)

Post by Titanoboa »

It wasn't clear to anyone until it happened, I think. So no worries there!

Post Reply