Ladle 41

[Mkay1]

http://wiki.armagetronad.net/index.php? ... enge_Board

Woohoo!

January 9th

[Magic]

-1 for tardyness

[Hoax]

Magic there implementing his own crude version of meccas forum karma

[dariv]

Did this overwrite the ladle 40 wiki? Why don't we create a new page for a new ladle?

[dreadlord]

1. Creating a new page for every new ladle would be much more work.

2. You can find the brackets of all past ladles on the challenge board.

[Jip]

Did this overwrite the ladle 40 wiki? Why don't we create a new page for a new ladle?

http://wiki.armagetronad.net/index.php?title=Ladle_40

[INW]

Did this overwrite the ladle 40 wiki? Why don't we create a new page for a new ladle?

A new page is made for each ladle after the ladle is over so that the url to the challenge board is the same url every ladle.
Creating a new page for each ladle before the actual ladle will mean that each ladle will have a different url to get to sign up teams.

Me and luck have implemented this for the WST starting this WST.

[Magic]

Magic there implementing his own crude version of meccas forum karma

Mine doesn't have positives

[PokeMaster]

glad it took 3 people to answer dariv's question. wd.

[Concord]

I like that Pike takes the time to alphabetize the team list. It's a nice touch.

[PokeMaster]

ohhhhh that is nice. wd pike!

[Mkay1]

TAOF is just looking for trouble. I assume they are planning to op their members, as so many smurf trams do. In this case, nobody really knows who is playing. As a result, one player could be playing for two teams. For all we know, they are not a valid team, considering those names could just be random.

We really need an @ladle auth, to prevent things like this.

Then again, are they breaking the rules?

Edit: nvm this post, I guess..although an @ ladle auth would be cool

[sinewav]

I wouldn't worry about it.

[PokeMaster]

innocent until proven guilty. You don't know what they're about, so don't make assumptions.

[Mkay1]

K, assumptions make an ass out of I.