Ladle 39 - The Last Ladle with TSP Servers?

[apparition]

Everyone knows they're bad. It's time to replace them.

[epsy]

Always been satisfied with the servers he provided me with. As I said before, get up and do something about them(ie. help admin them) instead of sitting on your ass and shouting "delete".

[apparition]

If you've always been satisfied, maybe you should try playing a Ladle in one. This has been an issue for a long time now. And it's not an issue with administration. Maybe you really have no idea what the problem is. Get off your ass and go figure it out instead of shouting that it's not your problem.

Should we just work with Luke-Jr to get some real servers up for Ladle days only? Luke, how much would that cost?

[Lord Pein]

TSP CH performed a lot better than CT's USA, replace CT's USA as well?

[Slov]

It's time to replace them.

+1

[wap]

I agree. No offense to the owner, but why is this server TSP CH signed up for the ladle? It's a nice input, but the server is really bad.

That match wasn't about skills, it was about who had the least lags. I mean a few times I just died and holed my own defense, those moments are crucial.

[chah]

tsp servers are great for me , CT usa just utterly failed though.

[INW]

If you back a few pages on the Ladle topics and stuff, I told everyone that the server is shit and that CTb is probably better than us...but the server will give us the advantage. I guess no one could put a server in to sub it.

I mean, Oracle 3v3 war sumo'd vcl last week and we are all american. We slid half way across the map...I am not sure how the euros played in it.

Scene had my server up as we could have used that instead of TSP CH but it was put up one round too late.

This ladle was the worst ladle for servers and I know it would have a ton different ending if all of the servers could hold a 6v6 fort match.

TSP CH couldn't even hold a 3v3 Sumo match with americans; let alone a 6v6 fort match with euros.

Sorry again CTb

[owned]

I seem to remember all of the semis and final servers being extremely laggy a few ladles back. But no doubt this ladle had a lot of laggy servers.

[INW]

I WILL have my server up for the next ladle and it WILL be used!

Hehe, it is a great USA server and I will get on scene about it being up 24/7!

[Titanoboa]

On that note, how was _~R~_Kansas? Should it be used in ladle 40?

directed at unk and speebros.

[Desolate]

On a positive note, Pru's server handled very nicely. There was only one major lag that cost our team a round(which can end up being crucial, but only one.) Players on both teams had small lags and slides and such, but it was definitely not above average. Consider it for semi-final's matches in later ladles.

[-*inS*-]

On that note, how was _~R~_Kansas? Should it be used in ladle 40?

directed at unk and speebros.

Personally for me it was fine.

[ppotter]

Was good for me too.

[wildcat]

Good server