Ladle 40

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply
User avatar
INW
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1950
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA

Re: Ladle 40

Post by INW »

I got a screenie of the first match but Z-Man's annoying fullscreen message at the end prevented me from taking a screenshot of the last match.

Anyway, congrats CT and I expect to have a rematch next ladle :D
PokeMaster
Match Winner
Posts: 638
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:36 am

Re: Ladle 40

Post by PokeMaster »

Gz. CT. I didn't watch you guys play at all, but I'm not surprised you won. I would rate you guys the #1 team in fortress right now.

Gz to SP too in our match. Your guys' holing technique is near flawless, and ruins us every time.
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
User avatar
INW
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1950
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA

Re: Ladle 40

Post by INW »

PokeMaster wrote:I would rate you guys the #1 team in fortress right now.
Agreed.
PokeMaster wrote:Gz to SP too in our match. Your guys' holing technique is near flawless, and ruins us every time.
They never holed us ;) I would say our holing was flawless...except once! :D
User avatar
-*inS*-
Round Winner
Posts: 320
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:31 pm

Re: Ladle 40

Post by -*inS*- »

Congrats CT, you guys are great.

Thanks poke - unlucky about the disconnect was fun playing vs you as well.

INW - hard to hole vs 5 sweepers isn't it? I suicided at least 1/3 of the rounds, but gz on beating us.
Image
User avatar
INW
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1950
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA

Re: Ladle 40

Post by INW »

-*inS*- wrote:INW - hard to hole vs 5 sweepers isn't it? I suicided at least 1/3 of the rounds, but gz on beating us.
Me Liz and Spook were always at attack...well when spook didn't kill himself XD
That would leave 2 sweepers and 1 defender. But anyways, thanks for the advice; I'll make sure we put 5 sweepers on you guys next time ;)
owned
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 876
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Ladle 40

Post by owned »

These were taken during the Cta vs. Ctb match. There were so many cters that they didn't all fit on the same screen XD.

http://img3.imageshack.us/i/somanyctersedited.png/

http://img703.imageshack.us/i/somanycters2edited.png/

16 cters, 1 ctter, 1 ex-cter, and two z-men :)
User avatar
-*inS*-
Round Winner
Posts: 320
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:31 pm

Re: Ladle 40

Post by -*inS*- »

INW wrote:
-*inS*- wrote:INW - hard to hole vs 5 sweepers isn't it? I suicided at least 1/3 of the rounds, but gz on beating us.
Me Liz and Spook were always at attack...well when spook didn't kill himself XD
That would leave 2 sweepers and 1 defender. But anyways, thanks for the advice; I'll make sure we put 5 sweepers on you guys next time ;)
No you guys paid more attention to Mecca than me :(, otherwise I'm sure I would have been cut and shrunk more than 0 times.

2v6 5 sweepers ftw: don't believe me watch the recording...
Image
Magic
Core Dumper
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:33 pm

Re: Ladle 40

Post by Magic »

Well can you blame them Ins they had to protect there def from my onslaught still usually I have a little trouble with 4 sweepers
User avatar
Mkay1
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Ladle 40

Post by Mkay1 »

lol
gawdzilla
Liz of the many names
Posts: 1124
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:13 am

Re: Ladle 40

Post by gawdzilla »

I lol'd a bit when we beat sp, because insa said it would only take him 2 matches to beat us implying that he was going to.

don't underestimate teams, this is pointed towards tx as well ;)
Concord
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:24 pm

Re: Ladle 40

Post by Concord »

Z-Man wrote:
Can we cut back on renegade access rights abuse the next time? I want to be the one abusing admin commands on my server and don't find it amusing when people are demoted and silenced without apparent reason by team leaders.

agreed completely. The ladle authorities should not be minimum, but maximum as well.
User avatar
-*inS*-
Round Winner
Posts: 320
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 10:31 pm

Re: Ladle 40

Post by -*inS*- »

gawdzilla wrote:I lol'd a bit when we beat sp, because insa said it would only take him 2 matches to beat us implying that he was going to.

don't underestimate teams, this is pointed towards tx as well ;)
Was a joke in a response to Oracle complaining we held them up 2 matches :roll: .

But wait, did you play? I strangely didn't see you at all - oh must've been sweeping :oops:, come back I miss you!
Image
User avatar
Desolate
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 1021
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Probably golfing

Re: Ladle 40

Post by Desolate »

i underestimated my own team this time, what you on about?
User avatar
Mkay1
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Ladle 40

Post by Mkay1 »

EDIT: nvm
User avatar
INW
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1950
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA

Re: Ladle 40

Post by INW »

-*inS*- wrote:But wait, did you play? I strangely didn't see you at all - oh must've been sweeping :oops:, come back I miss you!
She was at pos 1. Me and her holed u a bunch? Her and me got by fofo and flex a few times then i holed and she then messed up ur def a few times? O well, must have been too busy watching your own players while you were dead. ;)
Post Reply