Ladle 83

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply
User avatar
Soul
Match Winner
Posts: 449
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 4:45 pm

Re: Ladle 83

Post by Soul »

Vogue wrote: Ultimately, the only person who did something wrong was me
You're right. Lying to your whole clan and allowing a player to play on your team while knowingly breaking the rules is fine

CT USA 0
Last edited by Soul on Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Snxpflash
Average Program
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 4:56 am

Re: Ladle 83

Post by Snxpflash »

Plausible amendment:

Abc is disqualified from ladle 83
Serendipity plays best of 3 vs ct open
Winner faces Rogue for first ever re-final

Members of abc proven aware of the infraction/cheat recieve disciplinary action
Vogue
Match Winner
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:50 pm

Re: Ladle 83

Post by Vogue »

Technically, Mister didn't know I already played for Acceleration. So unless "lying" to your clan isn't permitted in ladle, only *I* broke the rules & it's only me who needs to be punished as ABC was unaware of me being Vein, and Mister was unaware of me already having played.

Nice try, Soul.
User avatar
ogo
Average Program
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:48 pm

Re: Ladle 83

Post by ogo »

Why wouldn't he know? It's on the wiki... That's a strange argument to make

And I was directing my comment entirely at you and mr, not abc

What's up with all these smoking women
User avatar
theo
Round Winner
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:06 am

Re: Ladle 83

Post by theo »

ogo wrote:What is the procedure for when players break the rules?
I believe the Warnings & penalties section applies.

2nd rule of Rules for players seems to have been broken by liz : "You may only play for one team each Ladle.".

I don't see any rule against mister's behavior. Even though it's probably morally reprehensible.
Last edited by theo on Wed Jul 09, 2014 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Vogue
Match Winner
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:50 pm

Re: Ladle 83

Post by Vogue »

He didn't know because who the hell cares about Acceleration vs Sh? Nobody bothered to check that result or who played for which team. I came in and said I could play, we conjured an alias (Vein) and that was that. I later told Mister I had already played after I broke the rules because I figured he knew, but he didn't.

Lana Del Rey is the queen.
User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6472
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle 83

Post by sinewav »

Vogue wrote:Ultimately, the only person who did something wrong was me so point your rules and punishments towards me.
You AND Mister. Lying to teammates is probably a bigger offense and he's not even ashamed of it:
misterplayer wrote:I apologize on behalf of Liz and I, for acting childish and wanting to play with each other ^.^
There is an extreme lack of sincerity in this post. It's actually mocking everyone.
misterplayer wrote:I can assure you it won't happen again.
A highly unbelievable statement. Although, the best way for it to never happen again is to never have mister on your team, something abc should consider.

It always amazes me how you selfish little kids do stuff like this especially since you are old enough to know better. Please ask yourself the following questions: What was gained by this deception? An hour of giggles? Is it worth being permanently tagged as a liar and a cheat?
Vogue
Match Winner
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:50 pm

Re: Ladle 83

Post by Vogue »

sinewav wrote:
Vogue wrote:Ultimately, the only person who did something wrong was me so point your rules and punishments towards me.
You AND Mister. Lying to teammates is probably a bigger offense
I'm not a person who should speak on moral offenses so I won't bother with that. I was pointing to ladle punishments, you must agree I'm the only player who did something wrong after reading my previous posts. ABC shouldn't be punished for things they didn't know, and I'm a repeated offender (DrHouse).
User avatar
theo
Round Winner
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:06 am

Re: Ladle 83

Post by theo »

theo wrote:I don't see any rule against mister's behavior.
I stand corrected. I believe rule 9 have been broken by both liz and mister : " Substitutes may be added until the start of the semi-finals. After the semi-finals begin, a team needs the approval of the opponent to add a substitute."
hawk
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 2:47 am

Re: Ladle 83

Post by hawk »

Who makes the decisions on this type of thing?

I agree with thumper, abc should be retroactively banned and any matches that need to be replayed should be.
hawk
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 2:47 am

Re: Ladle 83

Post by hawk »

Who makes the decisions on this type of thing?

I agree with thumper, abc should be retroactively banned and any matches that need to be replayed should be.
hawk
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 2:47 am

Re: Ladle 83

Post by hawk »

Who makes the decisions on this type of thing?

I agree with thumper, abc should be retroactively banned and any matches that need to be replayed should be.
User avatar
theo
Round Winner
Posts: 204
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:06 am

Re: Ladle 83

Post by theo »

hawk wrote:Who makes the decisions on this type of thing?
http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php/ ... rial_works
hawk wrote:I agree with thumper, abc should be retroactively banned and any matches that need to be replayed should be.
I don't.

There is no need to punish all the other abc players or to challenge _~R~_ well deserved victory.
Snxpflash
Average Program
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 4:56 am

Re: Ladle 83

Post by Snxpflash »

Ask Rogue, ct open team, and Serendipity. If all agree then schedule semi and finals rematch.
User avatar
Pr3
Round Winner
Posts: 356
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: Ladle 83

Post by Pr3 »

Vogue wrote:He didn't know because who the hell cares about Acceleration vs Sh? Nobody bothered to check that result or who played for which team. I came in and said I could play, we conjured an alias (Vein) and that was that. I later told Mister I had already played after I broke the rules because I figured he knew, but he didn't.
So you expect us to believe that Mr didn't know you already played and didn't question the need for you to use an "alias"? Did he not know you were the focal point of Acceleration? Did he not bother to check the wiki? Did he give two fu#ks? Can you two stop trying to pull the wool over our eyes because we're not this stupid. This whole thing is ridiculous and demands severe punishment from this community. This type of behavior not only ruins the spirit of competition but mocks every person who follows the "rules". If we let this go unpunished, what's to stop future players from breaking the rules. I think there should be a community vote to decide the punishment of both Liz and Mister. Liz should receive the most severe punishment in light of it being a repeat offense, and that punishment should be severe enough to send a message. Mr also should receive punishment based on what the community decides is adequate for his actions.
Post Reply