syllabear wrote:Sine, I'm sure if you're right, and God doesn't exist, and the Bible wasn't true and wasn't written, then there wouldn't be rape.
And you're criticising someone for using fallacious arguments? No one makes that claim, including the so-called "New Atheists" (Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris, etc.). None claim religion is the root of all evil. What we do point out can be summed in the Steven Weinberg quote: "With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."
As for your thoughtless, witless comments about free will, you have it exactly backwards. Being a fully-caused agent makes one
more responsible for their actions. It means that people can be caused to behave morally and ethically. And one of the main ways we cause them to act ethically is by holding them responsible and accountable. People who are capable of being warned in this fashion, who are capable of having their behavior shaped by the prospect of being held responsible, are moral agents. So we don’t need to be uncaused or have contra-causal free will to be held responsible, or to be moral agents, or to have morality. In fact, these things would be impossible if people had the supernatural power to act independently of causes, since they could just ignore the prospect of being held responsible and do whatever they darn well pleased.
Pro tip: Being a massive shit-talker in a video game doesn't make you lord of verbal smack-downs when actually called to task on something substantive.
Word wrote:I believe in a God who accepts everyone no matter what he has done or endured, as long as he sincerely regrets his mistakes
You do understand it's entirely possible to deliberately commit an immoral action that you know you'll regret afterwards, right? So, you, in this particular interpretation of Christianity, have given license to act immorally.
Of course, once more,
says you. Let me go ahead an elaborate on that a little more. Titanoboa, your statement that Word's theology doesn't reflect that of the majority of Christians, even if it's true (have you surveyed?), has no value. Are you really about to say that the "true" interpretation of Christianity is determined by whatever the current majority believes? And Word, you have no right to dismiss or condescend to evangelical fundamentalists. Fact is, you all presume to speak for the proper understanding of Christianity, but none of you—indeed, no Christian—has any particular authority or viable objective standard by which to give that veracity. There are as many versions or Christianity as there are people who profess to be Christians.
By the way, Word, did you download that PDF? You asked for 5 examples. I think that'll supply more than enough.
Word wrote:it's our duty to find a substitute for [rape] (I'd like to believe that some computer games could already help a great deal...)
This is beyond stupid. Not quite as far as 2020's asinine belief that the Fortress game mode of Armagetron can bring utopia to the Sudan, but close.
Kijutsu wrote:There's no way to "prevent" rape ... you can't prevent a rapist from raping.
Uh, no. Rape is not some natural hazard. The sort of mentality you just professed is a perfect example of
rape culture.
(You do realise, by the way, that I was speaking sarcastically and mocking you
in that other thread, right? On the subject of society versus your unthinking hardcore, narcissistic individualism?)
Shakesville: Rape Culture 101
http://www.mencanstoprape.org/
http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/RPE/index.html
http://www.rainn.org/
Read up. Get a clue, boys.