LADLE 34

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply
User avatar
Jip
Round Winner
Posts: 397
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:32 pm

Re: LADLE 34

Post by Jip »

will ladle 34 will be with EXPLOSION_RADIUS .75?
User avatar
Titanoboa
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1795
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:07 pm

Re: LADLE 34

Post by Titanoboa »

God I hope not.
User avatar
dreadlord
Match Winner
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:26 am
Location: Germany

Re: LADLE 34

Post by dreadlord »

RINCLUDE ladle24.cfg(http://durka.ath.cx/resource/ladle/ladle24.cfg)
RINCLUDE ladle33_authorities.cfg(http://crazy-tronners.com/resource/ladl ... rities.cfg)
SERVER_NAME 0x7fff7fLadle 33 0xff7f7f(0x7f7fffPlayer 1's Server0xff7f7f)
It's radius 2 ;)
User avatar
Jip
Round Winner
Posts: 397
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:32 pm

Re: LADLE 34

Post by Jip »

I think we should make a team vote (if not for ladle 34 then for ladle 35) for smaller holes.
User avatar
dreadlord
Match Winner
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:26 am
Location: Germany

Re: LADLE 34

Post by dreadlord »

Imo 0.75 is a bit too small, holes should be enterable ... at the moment we have 2, perhaps a vote for 1.5 or 1.25 ...
User avatar
Desolate
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 1021
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Probably golfing

Re: LADLE 34

Post by Desolate »

Dread, it's perfectly "enterable." It has been used in DS pro for weeks and there many people have stated how it works wonderfully well with gameplay.
Olive
Match Winner
Posts: 501
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:11 pm
Location: Amsterdam

Re: LADLE 34

Post by Olive »

Desolate wrote:Dread, it's perfectly "enterable." It has been used in DS pro for weeks and there many people have stated how it works wonderfully well with gameplay.
then, why should we change it?
Olive a.k.a ZeMu, MoonFlower & chicken.
User avatar
dreadlord
Match Winner
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:26 am
Location: Germany

Re: LADLE 34

Post by dreadlord »

Desolate: This was just my opinion, nothing more.

olive: The Radius is 2 at the moment and they want to open a poll about changing it to 0.75 as it is in DS Fortress Servers.
User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6488
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: LADLE 34

Post by sinewav »

Jip wrote:will ladle 34 will be with EXPLOSION_RADIUS .75?
We haven't determined the status of holes yet. I'll start a voting thread later in the week. For now, you can revisit the discussion here: http://forums3.armagetronad.net/viewtop ... 4&start=15
Gonzap
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 916
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 3:08 pm

Re: LADLE 34

Post by Gonzap »

small holes sux...
User avatar
Jip
Round Winner
Posts: 397
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:32 pm

Re: LADLE 34

Post by Jip »

nah, only zap sucks with small holes :P
Concord
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:24 pm

Re: LADLE 34

Post by Concord »

no, smaller holes do suck.
User avatar
dreadlord
Match Winner
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:26 am
Location: Germany

Re: LADLE 34

Post by dreadlord »

I agree to zap and concord.
User avatar
DDMJ
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 12:15 am
Location: LA, CA, USA, NA
Contact:

Re: LADLE 34

Post by DDMJ »

Desolate wrote:Dread, it's perfectly "enterable." It has been used in DS pro for weeks and there many people have stated how it works wonderfully well with gameplay.
0.75 is too small because with a small slide, you die trying to enter.
Goodygumdrops
Round Winner
Posts: 246
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:39 am

Re: LADLE 34

Post by Goodygumdrops »

DDMJ wrote:
Desolate wrote:Dread, it's perfectly "enterable." It has been used in DS pro for weeks and there many people have stated how it works wonderfully well with gameplay.
0.75 is too small because with a small slide, you die trying to enter.
tron shouldn't be a game because with a slide, you could die
Well...I did.
Post Reply