sinewav wrote:Also, Word, forgive me, but I can't tell if your last post was supposed to be a joke or not.
OK, I edited this a lot of times because I didn't think it made a lot of sense...not for the better though
the problem I had with your two questions is that the first one seems to be sort of suggestive while the second one assumes that I answer the first one with yes (which is like saying "can God create a box without knowing its content while he doesn't lose his omniscience?" - "Does God need such a box?").
here's my second try:
sinewav wrote:Are you saying the subtle differences in Christianity make it superior to other religions (aside from the fact they all have equally unproven supernatural claims)?
1) The differences aren't subtle if you just compare cultures with a different religious background. see previous post.
2) I'm Christian and that's why my religion is more important to me than others. I simply don't care if Christianity is superior or not but/although/because i personally think it is right to be part of it.
3) The question whether these wonders actually took place or not doesn't arise if you believe (apart from the Ascension). They aren't supernatural claims, they are parables (what you read out of it is up to you though).
sinewav wrote:What is the thing that makes your religion better even though is shares so much with the rest?
see my previous post. this isn't what makes us better but why i'm content. If I'd say "we're better" I could delete the post about tolerance.
