kyle wrote:I don't even remember the original reason why she was banned, I know the current extension was for disobeying the original ban. I'd say let her play, she's going to end up playing either way regardless, so as long as she does not play on more than 1 team (Looked it up) I don't see why no anymore.
VOGUE BAN [POLL]
Moderator: Light
Re: ladle
- [Anonymous]
- Round Winner
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 11:54 am
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
The only team who will even play with him is m&m and we ALL know they aren't foreign to cheating lol
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
i enjoy hearing about how she and m&m have to cheat to win a ladle with seven inactive teams too much
no thanks, +1 to sine
no thanks, +1 to sine
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
My attitude toward your ban has nothing to do with your behavior before it. I wasn't even a part of the initial ban vote. These are just the facts. You were banned for your behavior during Ladle then re-banned for behavior after implementation. You are completely unremorseful and I can't see any reason why the ban should be lifted early since you continue to evade it. I am actually surprised that there isn't another vote trying to extend it. You should consider yourself fortunate. Don't push your luck.Vogue wrote:...it's about people who are butthurt cause i've insulted them in the past. hows that fair exactly sine?
My comment about your past is only used to illustrate why so many people are unsympathetic to your undeserved appeal. No, I don't think you "contributed positively to ladle many years by bringing competition, rivalries and talent." All those things existed without you, and anything you brought was accompanied by drama. Much, much drama.
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
Let my gurl go, shes going to play anyway LOL
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
how can anyone call me unremorseful after this apology https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-yhNUxAc5U
i dare u!!!!!
i dare u!!!!!
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
Wow, that video was beautiful!
FREE LIZ
FREE LIZ
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
I have no personal beef with Liz but I still agree with what sinewav says about the whole situation.
@Liz
Without trying to sound patronising, you know, it's not too late to change things. You can be still be humorous and stand your ground without causing trouble, it is possible. I'm not even saying that if people give you shit you shouldn't give it back ten times harder, just don't ruin things for decent people that haven't done anything to you.
I'm surprised that you have said this.kyle wrote:I'd say let her play, she's going to end up playing either way regardless, so as long as she does not play on more than 1 team (Looked it up) I don't see why no anymore.
@Liz
Without trying to sound patronising, you know, it's not too late to change things. You can be still be humorous and stand your ground without causing trouble, it is possible. I'm not even saying that if people give you shit you shouldn't give it back ten times harder, just don't ruin things for decent people that haven't done anything to you.
Playing since December 2006
-
- Average Program
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
Grudges grudges. All of you are caught up in the past and don't realize the current state of the game. Also I thought the point of the 100th ladle was to get more players and for it to be more competitive? Well this is the first step lol
-
- Average Program
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
Soul wrote:i enjoy hearing about how she and m&m have to cheat to win a ladle with seven inactive teams too much
no thanks, +1 to sine
What? Anyone know what soul is talking about?
-
- Average Program
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
[Anonymous] wrote:The only team who will even play with him is m&m and we ALL know they aren't foreign to cheating lol
I would really love to know when m&m ever cheated
- kyle
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:33 pm
- Location: Indiana, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe, Multiverse
- Contact:
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
Maybe because I voted only 3 months for that second ban vote, maybe if it was only 3 months (really should have been 4, 1 for the missed and 3 to extend), she would have followed it and everything would have been over. But she has screwed over a lot of the people that were voting, so she got the maximum she could get. The 3rd vote came more than 4 ladles after the second ban. Therefore I've just felt this should have been over before it got extended the second time. I do believe anything she would do going forward should be highly punished.Monkey wrote:I'm surprised that you have said this.kyle wrote:I'd say let her play, she's going to end up playing either way regardless, so as long as she does not play on more than 1 team (Looked it up) I don't see why no anymore.
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
You dare me?Vogue wrote:how can anyone call me unremorseful after this apology https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-yhNUxAc5U
i dare u!!!!!
http://armanelgtron.tk/stuff/my_response.wav
Ok ok, maybe the "my response" file is a little "Just ridiculous, must-try-harder"...
Maybe I'll try and find a better electronic voice in the future.
*electronic sam = that microsoft voice
EDIT: I guess since I'm not involved in ladle I don't have much to say on the topic itself
Last edited by aP|Nelg on Wed Oct 14, 2015 3:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
@kyle
I too thought that 12 months was long for a ban, however, like you say, she has screwed over a lot of people. I think the main reason why I was surprised about what you said is that she seems to show no genuine remorse for anything she's done.
I too thought that 12 months was long for a ban, however, like you say, she has screwed over a lot of people. I think the main reason why I was surprised about what you said is that she seems to show no genuine remorse for anything she's done.
Playing since December 2006
Re: VOGUE BAN [POLL]
The game is just fine, I'm sorry you don't like it. Maybe you can play something else?misterplayer wrote:Grudges grudges. All of you are caught up in the past and don't realize the current state of the game.
Vogue's ban has nothing to do with grudges, though it wouldn't matter if it did. The Ladle community is under no obligation to create a perfect court system. We don't have to model it on the world's greatest efforts in judicial fairness because there are no lives on the line, no money exchanging hands. Besides, a justice system that did not consider the full history of a repeat offender would be very weak indeed. Don't like it? Don't play. This community has been exceedingly tolerant over the years and I can prove it with one word: BayLife.
There is no "point" to the hundredth Ladle. It's just simply the first Ladle event with three digits. People aren't trying to get more people for more competition, they are trying to get old players back for nostalgia.misterplayer wrote:Also I thought the point of the 100th ladle was to get more players and for it to be more competitive?