thanks al for the helpful replies

we finally got rid of this lycos
That's what I use, thanks for the heads up!Word wrote: I can't update to Windows 8.1 because my graphics driver (AMD Catalyst) causes the laptop to be unable to shut down properly
It just sounds like? This is no trivial matter. The interface redesign completely changes the out of box functionality of the operating system. Like I said, the only reason I'm able to work with it is because I'm a master with the keyboard, and even then using that system is problematic. They also moved and/or renamed many administration tools and control panel plugins. It's ridiculous. We all know just how bad it is compared to the other versions of Windows. Even today there are still more people using XP than Win8. That's a colossal failure. It's not really fair to say "Win8 is just another version of Windows." I'm speaking as an expert user who has been using Windows since 3.1.Light wrote:It just sounds like their change to how they did the blocks and whatnot is a dislike for you.
English, obviously not your strong suit. Its kind of cute that you think this will be the first result for virus cleaning though. Its not even the first result for tron, its not even on the first page last time I looked.ConVicT wrote:When people get this thread on google when they get the virus, they're going to click it for help and end up with help on which version of Windows to get.
Was I typing in Spanish?/dev/null wrote:English, obviously not your strong suit. Its kind of cute that you think this will be the first result for virus cleaning though. Its not even the first result for tron, its not even on the first page last time I looked.ConVicT wrote:When people get this thread on google when they get the virus, they're going to click it for help and end up with help on which version of Windows to get.
I just looked in fact, and GLTron comes up before us. Thats hilarious. We show up on page 10.
http://i.imgur.com/kuC0sSR.jpg
I disagree. Certainly in the open source world, backward compatibility is much less important. This is because most open source software is continuously maintained and, for the stuff that isn't, there is almost always a better alternative. There may be the odd exception to this but I can't think of one./dev/null wrote:Microsofts backward support is the envy of all operating systems
Apples and Oranges.Monkey wrote:This is because most [open source] software is continuously maintained and, for the stuff that isn't, there is almost always a better alternative.
How?sinewav wrote:Apples and Oranges.
Are you saying the data was in a proprietory format initially? Are you sure there are no open source programs that could access that format? Ardour is a pretty good DAW btw.sinewav wrote:I was working on a remix on an old song I wrote and needed to export MIDI data from a file I created in 1995.
Installing multiple versions of python is trivial on any decent open source OS./dev/null wrote:python
This used to be the case but nowadays it's a lot easier. More importantly, the need to change is becoming less and less as time goes on./dev/null wrote:The problem is its always a convoluted process to move from one program to another.
The whole point I'm making is that I wouldn't need or want to. I, like you guys, have been using computers for many years (over 30 years in my case) yet the current state of open source meets all of my computing needs, including accessing old code and data. Hopefully, in a few years, it will meet all of your needs too./dev/null wrote:I can grab a program from the 90s and run it on modern windows without much hassle, try that on unix or linux.