Please refer to this post and read what I said to dinobro (specifically the last paragraph; starting from "Now about that definition of 'race':"), I would only say the same thing in response. The sub-topic / argument of "if Nazis are a race" is irrelevant to the point of this overall discussion. It's prejudice nonetheless.Word wrote:Now I wonder what actual World War II Nazis themselves would say to Durf. They'd probably be as confused as everyone else here. There is no Nazi race. Even if by Nazi you mean Aryan, which is the denomination the Nazis themselves employed, you'd be wrong because it is an unscientific concept that only served to give their ideology an intellectual foundation.
I don't see why not; to both your questions. But I suppose that's more of a philosophical thing. You are free to see things how you wish to see them (and/or how you believe you are forced to see them). What you take seriously or who you try to show empathy for is your choice and you have your own reasons. But IMO, I think you should take what I have to say seriously because I've taken what everyone here has to say seriously (unfortunately even the trolls :s) out of respect that every has their own unique perspective and they have a unique viewpoint to share. If your second question wasn't so vague on what specifically you're talking about (inherent meaning of what), I'd be able to answer more. Though I suspect you mean the imagery associated such as the swastika, which I've already discussed is also a religious symbol, and also just a plain "good-luck" symbol (like a character, a letter).Word wrote:So Durf, why should we take anything you say seriously? Why should anyone try to have empathy for anyone else when everything is just based on their preconceptions and nothing has an inherent meaning that isn't up for a positive interpretation?
Furthermore, it's not like I'm joking about any of this. Like I said, I don't see why you wouldn't.
^ How in the world did you come to that conclusion? Where did I ever imply such a scenario? More importantly...WTF?Word wrote:Yeah, like our lawmakers sat together and someone said "Hey, we have little-to-no Asian cultural influence, we don't need swastikas, let's ban them just for the sake!", standing ovations.Durf wrote:Also, I'm surprised the swastika is banned in Germany, but that's also understandable since there is little-to-no Asian cultural influence there
The swastika is just a symbol, reread back a few more pages or just read here. And I never implied that any laws were put in "just for the sake!". Please... >_> What are you doing?
I don't think you made a valid case. "if interpreted correctly"; I'd like to know what was so correct about the way you interpreted my posts...more specifically, how you came to your conclusions :sWord wrote:You somehow keep betraying yourself and don't see the big pile of crap in front of you, until you have to admit that the emptiness of virtually everything else around that pile which you use to counter isn't really supporting your case (and on the contrary, if intepreted correctly, helping to further outline that pile).
But, this is also a bit of a "sub-topic" and kinda off-topic since it's more about the prejudice and bad treatment of tronners (race or not, racism or not; it's not right).
I'm still waiting from replies from other people, and I'd rather not clutter the forums with topics that have already been discussed a few pages ago. We can PM if you want to talk in depth without "cluttering" any forums up or having it locked on us..? I mean, if you have something to post about the topic and not just me, then by all means... But for something like this I'd rather focus on the discussion at hand.
<edit>
Since this post started a new page; I'd like to remind a few people that I'm waiting on responses to this post.