Ladle 66
Moderator: Light
Re: Ladle 66
Lets hope we get 16 teams again...I have a feeling we will.
Playing since December 2006
Re: Ladle 66
14 of them will be yoursMonkey wrote:Lets hope we get 16 teams again...I have a feeling we will.
Re: Ladle 66
tbf we could put in 4 ven
Re: Ladle 66
Anyone interested in more text info, like a short paragraph of what happened in the match & who played where etc. Something tells me this was mentioned quite a while ago but obviously I cba to search
As it is now, unless you were there or asked around all you know about a match is the score (ignoring recordings). Did zap play? How did rz do? Lineups aren't always accurate either, etc.
As it is now, unless you were there or asked around all you know about a match is the score (ignoring recordings). Did zap play? How did rz do? Lineups aren't always accurate either, etc.
Re: Ladle 66
That is an interesting idea Hoax. The best way I can think for that to happen is for the post-Ladle discussion on this forum, in this thread. If everyone takes a little time to describe their matches, one of us (*cough* Concord *cough*) can write up a synopsis or abstract and attach it to the Challenge Board for archiving.Hoax wrote:Anyone interested in more text info, like a short paragraph of what happened in the match & who played where etc.
Let us remind ourselves to not only give server feedback after Ladle, but team performance feedback as well.
Re: Ladle 66
Like predictions post ladle without the predictions part?sinewav wrote:That is an interesting idea Hoax. The best way I can think for that to happen is for the post-Ladle discussion on this forum, in this thread. If everyone takes a little time to describe their matches, one of us (*cough* Concord *cough*) can write up a synopsis or abstract and attach it to the Challenge Board for archiving.Hoax wrote:Anyone interested in more text info, like a short paragraph of what happened in the match & who played where etc.
Let us remind ourselves to not only give server feedback after Ladle, but team performance feedback as well.
Signature? wtf...
Re: Ladle 66
Like predictions but not a waste of time and without the shameless self-promotionCronix wrote:Like predictions post ladle without the predictions part?
- delinquent
- Match Winner
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 3:07 am
Re: Ladle 66
Maybe it could go on fortfix?
Re: Ladle 66
Fortfix is poorly updated atm, I'm not sure who Concord added to contributers but they're not doing a very good job. Recaps from matches being added to fortfix is a good idea, though!
Re: Ladle 66
BRACKETS
HELP: We are missing 1 EU server.
Looks like a good turnout. Rd and RT get a bye and uNk has 2 teams again! GL HF.
HELP: We are missing 1 EU server.
Looks like a good turnout. Rd and RT get a bye and uNk has 2 teams again! GL HF.
Re: Ladle 66
I will setup one. Add it to the wiki right now.sinewav wrote:HELP: We are missing 1 EU server.
Re: Ladle 66
Wasn't the ladle date changed last year to miss the Super Bowl?
Edit: Wait, maybe not?
Edit: Wait, maybe not?
Re: Ladle 66
It says:Soul wrote:Wasn't the ladle date changed last year to miss the Super Bowl?
Edit: Wait, maybe not?
Ladle will always be on the first sunday of the month. Exception is when it would be 3 days after new-years (i think) then it will be moved to the second sunday o.o
Signature? wtf...