As far as this thread is concerned, Elmo's revelation is old news. I tried to stimulate some related discussion, as I thought it would be interesting, but instead after some rather confusing posts between the two of us, Phyto decided to make a contribution which was both personal and negative (see quote below)
Phytotron wrote:...to ostentatiously muse over what he thinks he's learned from his gender studies class(es) at university, or whatever he's babbling about
A personal jibe, with Phyto (educated, teacher) positioned in contrast with myself (still learning, stupid), which results in what I have said - and consequently anything that I go on to say - as 'babble', i.e. meaningless, dumb, a waste of breathe. And all that simply because I ascribe to a different philosophical paradigm, nice
I felt belittled and insulted, and thus rather than discuss this point any further, I thought I would address the root of the problem. My comment was then a little too personal (and therefore a little hypocritical, but it nonetheless got my point across; if not to you, Sine, and Phyto, then at least to some of those who feel similarly persecuted - the 'we'). This is the history of this thread as I perceive it, and it seems like an adequate space to continue this discussion
As for "proof" of Phyto (and co.)'s behaviour, do I really need to answer that? Read Gonzap and Aiph's posts... Open your eyes! If you really can't see how the way you (and co.) operate is essentially bullying other's opinions, then we're at a dead end
Everything is subjective any way, so 'proving' anyone's guilt is not going to be possible with cold, hard fact/truth (har har har, postmodernism lolol psy so dumb)