Ladle 55

[dreadlord]

+1 for TronZero #1 and CT Liv

good matches everyone

That.

[Z-Man]

Recordings for 0.2.8.3.2:

final_ctliv_cooltrainers_vs_revolver.aarec 33228kb 4072s

semi_ctliv_rt_vs_revolver.aarec 37972kb 3963s
semi_ctmbx_cooltrainers_vs_speedhax.aarec 25436kb 2918s

quarter_ctliv_cta_vs_rt.aarec 39296kb 4143s
quarter_ctmbx_speedhax_vs_elite.aarec 20076kb 2295s
quarter_tz1_revolver_vs_swift.aarec 18936kb 2544s

[Olive]

+1 for TronZero #1 and CT Liv

good matches everyone

That.

ditto

[Z-Man]

Moar:

octa_ctliv_cta_vs_rr_part1.aarec 12940kb 1589s (then the server crashed/went offline)
octa_ctliv_cta_vs_rr_part2.aarec 7944kb 1132s (not sure whether that caught everything)
octa_ctmbx_xenocide_vs_speedhax.aarec 23988kb 3617s
octa_ctu_cooltrainers_vs_mym_plus_quarter_cooltrainers_vs_tx.aarec 83940kb 8572s (oops, didn't catch the match end, so this is two games in one)
octa_tz1_revolver_vs_una.aarec 13608kb 2154s
octa_z_swift_vs_unk.aarec 28304kb 3106s

[Titanoboa]

Thanks once again for the recordings, Z-man!

[DaGarBBaGeMAN]

you didn't get 3t's first round match? aw

[sinewav]

+1 for CT USA. Felt pretty good for me.

Congrats Revolver.

[dlh]

Server Quality: +1 for TronZero 1, and CT LIV.

Good matches everyone. We didn't use a sweep-box, and I don't recall an opponent using one either. It definitely made the pace of the matches more fun, and it kept us on schedule.

Thanks Z-Man for recording.

[Z-Man]

you didn't get 3t's first round match? aw

No. I can only follow so many games at once with recording clients (where I can't do anything but watch, no pressing TAB to see scores or players, no page up to read past messages) and acceptable error rates, so I stick to the four designated quarter final servers and my own.

[dreadlord]

Server Quality: +1 for TronZero 1, and CT LIV.

Good matches everyone. We didn't use a sweep-box, and I don't recall an opponent using one either. It definitely made the pace of the matches more fun, and it kept us on schedule.

Thanks Z-Man for recording.

Yet another post I totally agree with.

[Mkay1]

3t used one. I solved that problem bye centering them, though.

[Gonzap]

-1 CT liv, crashed once and few slides but that might be my internet provider. Anyway the crash makes it -1.

Gz to the winners.

[Zimblunk]

Hey sine, I couldn't wait any longer to see the statistics page updated, so I did it myself; hope you don't mind.

Ladle 55 server ratings
0000: CT LIV (-1)
Vinny: CT LIV (-1)
vov: ID VA 2 (-10000000000) [I'm counting it as -1]
zat: ID VA 2 (-1)
ItzAcid: MBX (+1)
Titanoboa: Z-man's (+1), Tronzero 1 (+1)
Overrated: CT LIV (+1), Tronzero 2 (0)
Elmo: CT USA (+1), CT LIV (+1), CT MBX (+1)
Concord: TronZero 1 (+1), CT LIV (+1)
dreadlord / Olive: not sure if you're rating the servers, or just agreeing with Concord.
sinewav: CT USA (+1)
dlh: TronZero 1 (+1), CT LIV (+1)
Gonzap: CT LIV (-1)

Totals:
CT LIV: +1
ID VA 2: -2
CT MBX: +2
Z-man's: +1
TronZero 2: 0
CT USA: +2
TronZero 1: +3

And I'm presuming the Milestones section hasn't changed from last month.

[Concord]

I totalled them using decay of e^(-t/5), where t is the number of Ladles since the rating. For example, a rating of +1 is worth +1 this month, +0.82 after the next ladle, +0.67 the Ladle after that, +0.55, etc.

[sinewav]

I totalled them using decay of e^(-t/5), where t is the number of Ladles since the rating. For example, a rating of +1 is worth +1 this month, +0.82 after the next ladle, +0.67 the Ladle after that, +0.55, etc.

I don't understand your formula at all and I don't see how it makes a difference over a raw score without decay or smoothing.