Ladle 46
Moderator: Light
Re: Ladle 46
Teen or Sylla needs to be banned from next ladle or Deja Vu needs to be banned from next ladle, Rond 1 started at 1:pm they subed in Mac&cheese without even asking us if they could espically when he wasen't on the wiki until 1:22pm way past deadline...
Re: Ladle 46
That's the thing about substitutes, they don't have to be on the wiki and you don't need approval until later in the game. Here's the current policy on subs:Spook wrote:Teen or Sylla needs to be banned from next ladle or Deja Vu needs to be banned from next ladle, Rond 1 started at 1:pm they subed in Mac&cheese without even asking us if they could espically when he wasen't on the wiki until 1:22pm way past deadline...
There was no need to add him to the wiki, so that little bit of editing probably caused more confusion than anything. I double-checked all the wiki edits and everything seems to be in order. They didn't make any other player changes either.Substitutes may be added until the start of the semi-finals. After the semi-finals begin, a team needs the approval of the opponent to add a substitute.
Now, I know some of these guys have a reputation for behaving badly, but that's a different type of accusation not made. Procedurally, they acted along with the current guidelines.
It sounds like a heated match. Let's all cool down a bit.
Re: Ladle 46
Your message contains 6 characters. The minimum number of characters you need to enter is 21.
- INW
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Re: Ladle 46
Not sure if the europeans noticed it in CT's LIV but the lagometers were very inconsistent and unstable for the americans on my team. They were average size for a euro server, an eighth of the zone prolly, but they would randomly jump to about half the size of the zone and go back down.
I didn't experience any slides but the server didn't seem stable for me today.
Was still fun to play on.
I didn't experience any slides but the server didn't seem stable for me today.
Was still fun to play on.
Re: Ladle 46
Your message contains 6 characters. The minimum number of characters you need to enter is 21.
Re: Ladle 46
typical loser talk. I told you to go check the rules politely, then when you kept insisting, of course I'm going to get a bit ruder as you did.
As I said to you in game, I didn't like it when ID did it to Tu a few ladles ago, but I didn't bitch and moan the whole time, I read the rules, realised they were right, and went on and played.
GMs to the rest of DS and to R, and SP... you guys are the ones to beat this ladle.
As I said to you in game, I didn't like it when ID did it to Tu a few ladles ago, but I didn't bitch and moan the whole time, I read the rules, realised they were right, and went on and played.
GMs to the rest of DS and to R, and SP... you guys are the ones to beat this ladle.
The Halley's comet of Armagetron.
ps I'm not tokoyami
ps I'm not tokoyami
Re: Ladle 46
thunderstorm again
Re: Ladle 46
Gz baker street irregulars, well played. I only wish the server didn't keep killing me. AoT cannot hold up for a 6v6 game, randomly sliding into your own defence is not what I call fort.
pLxDari - Challenge us!
Re: Ladle 46
Sorry, not the server though. It's your connection. I imagine this will be a bigger and bigger problem with all servers/players as time goes on. If you haven't noticed, thousands and thousands of people are joining the Internet everyday, some with multiple devices. ISP's are over-selling their product and the result is everyone's line quality suffers. I've pretty much given up on playing Arma competitively because there isn't a ISP in my area that can provide a stable enough connection - and my connection was fine 6 months ago.dariv wrote:AoT cannot hold up for a 6v6 game, randomly sliding into your own defence is not what I call fort.
I mean, I can have luke-jr post the sever stats to show the ridiculous amount of headroom the server has, but that won't solve anything. I heard similar complaints about CT LIV today too and that server used to be reliable. If someone wants to submit an alternative server to AoT I'll gladly stop submitting mine.
Re: Ladle 46
Good matches all!
Strange match vs CT, we lost that second match 100-20 I think haha
Tight at the end Tx, was a lot of fun. Thanks for games, see you all next month!
Strange match vs CT, we lost that second match 100-20 I think haha
Tight at the end Tx, was a lot of fun. Thanks for games, see you all next month!
Re: Ladle 46
Recordings for 0.2.8.3.1. First, non-mine servers. Just one recording per server, started them about when sweet sixteen kicked off and let them run until I noticed the servers were empty:
CTLIV.aarec 77200kb 10327s
ID.aarec 59592kb 7537s
INW.aarec 12308kb 6244s
UNK.aarec 25512kb 6291s
CTLIV.aarec 77200kb 10327s
ID.aarec 59592kb 7537s
INW.aarec 12308kb 6244s
UNK.aarec 25512kb 6291s
Re: Ladle 46
More care on my server:
z-man-final_tx_vs_speeders.aarec 32792kb 3234s
z-man-semi_tx_vs_mym.aarec 46136kb 4991s
z-man-ss_tx_vs_bakerstreet.aarec 23956kb 3641s Umm, that was actually an e8 game. My bad.
z-man-ss_tx_vs_creepyheroes.aarec 14888kb 1857s
z-man-opening_DpG_vs_creepyheroes.aarec 10212kb 1509s
z-man-final_tx_vs_speeders.aarec 32792kb 3234s
z-man-semi_tx_vs_mym.aarec 46136kb 4991s
z-man-ss_tx_vs_bakerstreet.aarec 23956kb 3641s Umm, that was actually an e8 game. My bad.
z-man-ss_tx_vs_creepyheroes.aarec 14888kb 1857s
z-man-opening_DpG_vs_creepyheroes.aarec 10212kb 1509s
Re: Ladle 46
Fun ladle! gm's Silly Puddy, DV, CT and Tx!
CT match was intense, nf's wap, zap etc etc, really fun match for me.
And Tx phew, I got nervous there in the end =P
CT match was intense, nf's wap, zap etc etc, really fun match for me.
And Tx phew, I got nervous there in the end =P
Re: Ladle 46
ye ye syllla, fu and gz ^.-