International Challenge - Discussion
Moderator: Light
- Desolate
- Shutout Match Winner
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:31 pm
- Location: Probably golfing
Re: International Challenge - Discussion
Gratz on a successful international tournament (I know that's debatable for some teams). If you guys are interested in another, what's the time frame for this kind of tournament, 3 months, 6, or a year?
Next time we can also try to address some of the major issues, the US team(s) and servers assigned to euro vs euro matches, (or na vs na).
Next time we can also try to address some of the major issues, the US team(s) and servers assigned to euro vs euro matches, (or na vs na).
Re: International Challenge - Discussion
one WC per year sounds most logical to me 

Re: International Challenge - Discussion
Once a year.
I want to remind you that short-term solutions are usually not a good thing. I'm talking about countries lining up several teams, and some mixed teams.
You mixed up a lot of the teams to get a more balanced tournament; not as one-sided. The result was ironically a rather one-sided tournament, with a few interesting matches. Two mixed teams* played in the finals. While a good matchup, it hardly came close to the level of a ladle final - where mixed teams belong. *(Spain+Argentina+USA) vs. (Hungary+Romania+United Arab Emirates+Austria)
There was a lot of talk (that got this tourney started in the first place) about which country would win a world cup. USA and Netherlands were the most popular suggestions, with UK and France not far behind. This tourney showed that Netherlands vs France was an even match, and fun to watch (I saw small parts). We still don't know if the best US team would beat them though, let alone which country would win the tourney.
So what if some players from USA/Europe/Asia don't get to play? We can watch. Shouldn't it be a privilege to play in a World Cup, rather than a right?
So what if there's only 7 teams - that doesn't mean it can't be an interesting and fun tournament.
And it's not a big deal if a smaller country (in terms of player amount) only can show with 4 or 5 players. Sure they probably can't win the entire tourney, but they can have fun playing to see how far they can go.
Refugees (my team this tourney) played some really fun matches 4v6, doing our best to reach the quarter finals. Our efforts weren't enough, but we had fun trying.
I don't mind Eastern bloc forming a team, but they weren't all from the Eastern Bloc.
I don't mind Hispanics teaming up, but they weren't all hispanic.
don't forget, United Kingdom is a mixed team too.
For the same reasons, I'd be ok with a Scandinavian or even Nordic team. Only if all players are from that area though.
I think a fully manned Eastern Bloc (emmy, slash, pike, xyron, hamar, sixzero, animal) or a concentrated USA team would win. Netherlands, UK, France, possibly Germany and Hispanics would all be fighting for the title World Champions though.
I want to remind you that short-term solutions are usually not a good thing. I'm talking about countries lining up several teams, and some mixed teams.
You mixed up a lot of the teams to get a more balanced tournament; not as one-sided. The result was ironically a rather one-sided tournament, with a few interesting matches. Two mixed teams* played in the finals. While a good matchup, it hardly came close to the level of a ladle final - where mixed teams belong. *(Spain+Argentina+USA) vs. (Hungary+Romania+United Arab Emirates+Austria)
There was a lot of talk (that got this tourney started in the first place) about which country would win a world cup. USA and Netherlands were the most popular suggestions, with UK and France not far behind. This tourney showed that Netherlands vs France was an even match, and fun to watch (I saw small parts). We still don't know if the best US team would beat them though, let alone which country would win the tourney.
So what if some players from USA/Europe/Asia don't get to play? We can watch. Shouldn't it be a privilege to play in a World Cup, rather than a right?
So what if there's only 7 teams - that doesn't mean it can't be an interesting and fun tournament.
And it's not a big deal if a smaller country (in terms of player amount) only can show with 4 or 5 players. Sure they probably can't win the entire tourney, but they can have fun playing to see how far they can go.
Refugees (my team this tourney) played some really fun matches 4v6, doing our best to reach the quarter finals. Our efforts weren't enough, but we had fun trying.
I don't mind Eastern bloc forming a team, but they weren't all from the Eastern Bloc.
I don't mind Hispanics teaming up, but they weren't all hispanic.
don't forget, United Kingdom is a mixed team too.
For the same reasons, I'd be ok with a Scandinavian or even Nordic team. Only if all players are from that area though.
I think a fully manned Eastern Bloc (emmy, slash, pike, xyron, hamar, sixzero, animal) or a concentrated USA team would win. Netherlands, UK, France, possibly Germany and Hispanics would all be fighting for the title World Champions though.
- INW
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:10 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Re: International Challenge - Discussion
I agree 100% titan.
The privilege to play in the cup...exactly!!!!!!
One might argue "But there are so many more American players"
Well in real life, there are probably a lot more players in America trying to join one fort cup team as well. It is competition.
Because there are so many American's, it'll just be harder for all of us. Oh well. Thats competition. The privilege to play.
The privilege to play in the cup...exactly!!!!!!
One might argue "But there are so many more American players"
Well in real life, there are probably a lot more players in America trying to join one fort cup team as well. It is competition.
Because there are so many American's, it'll just be harder for all of us. Oh well. Thats competition. The privilege to play.
Re: International Challenge - Discussion
Pretty sure all the UK players reside in England anyway 

Re: International Challenge - Discussion
Not quite.INW wrote:I agree 100% titan.
The privilege to play in the cup...exactly!!!!!!
One might argue "But there are so many more American players"
Well in real life, there are probably a lot more players in America trying to join one fort cup team as well. It is competition.
Because there are so many American's, it'll just be harder for all of us. Oh well. Thats competition. The privilege to play.
China: Over 1.3 billion people
USA: 310 million
Also just because we have more people, doesn't mean we are interested in playing that particular sport.
EDIT: Oh, nvm I thought you meant soccer world cup. Also Isn't the tourney real life? That is what threw me off
Re: International Challenge - Discussion
The UK should not be regarded as a mixed team when compared to a bunch of countries connected only by geographical location or a language
Skeptical teams aside I'm sure most people had fun wd the winners & thx to the organisers & admins
Skeptical teams aside I'm sure most people had fun wd the winners & thx to the organisers & admins
Re: International Challenge - Discussion
well chah is brazilian and he is southamerican like me so it was why he choose us. i guess...
and insa.. well he have a kind of spanglish
and insa.. well he have a kind of spanglish


Re: International Challenge - Discussion
I'm pretty sure when I signed up Deso put the team together as "Hispanic/latino" whatever team, not just Hispanics, i just went along with it cause I didn't think it mattered enough to bring up.
Don't hate the player, hate the entire clan.
Re: International Challenge - Discussion
LOL we just won and we would only possibly win next oneTitanoboa wrote:I think a fully manned Eastern Bloc (emmy, slash, pike, xyron, hamar, sixzero, animal) or a concentrated USA team would win. Netherlands, UK, France, possibly Germany and Hispanics would all be fighting for the title World Champions though.

Re: International Challenge - Discussion
Gz 

Albert Einstein wrote:"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

Re: International Challenge - Discussion
Btw, Ladle 17 was the first ladle with more than 8 teams. Ladle 2, 5, 7, 8 and 15 only had 4 teams.
What's wrong with starting small?
What's wrong with starting small?
Re: International Challenge - Discussion
The UK was not a mixed team... everyone in the UK was from the UK, which is a recognised nation!
pLxDari - Challenge us!
- Desolate
- Shutout Match Winner
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:31 pm
- Location: Probably golfing
Re: International Challenge - Discussion
recognized* 

Re: International Challenge - Discussion
Just wanted to point out that UK is, while England isn't, technically, a mixed team. And I wasn't trying to complain about any of the teams that participated.