Random Screenshot Junk

[gawdzilla]

http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/8392 ... hot52o.png

[Phytotron]

So, every time there's a bit of a lull, in your deliberate attempts at despoiling the forum and creating mindless conflicts, antagonism, and "drama," you and your shameless, half-witted, miscreant crew of pathetic excuses for juvenile delinquents find yourselves itching and desperate for attention, of contention, of flame threads and other web culture bullshit that one of you must go out of your way to identify an opportunity, or if one isn't obviously available, even dig out something and engage in blatant trolling like this idiotic, baited spam post in a vain, craven, cheap attempt at inciting a reaction. You little shits already cluster bombed this thread, and you saw it erupt and get split once. Now you're back at it again. What is wrong with you? These are not rhetorical questions I repeatedly pose to you jackasses. Answer them. Why do go out of your ways to behave like such inane, sadistic sociopaths with the web as your little Lord of the Flies playground? Or are you naturally that way? You're despicable drecks—obnoxious, self-centered, puerile nuisances. You're not cool, creative, rebellious, or original. You're not amusing or witty. You're worthless, pitiful wastes of humanity and failures at life, and will surely never contribute anything whatsoever of value. Go jump off a bridge.

[Word]

I'd have added the "rot in hell"-part

that's why I'm catholic. it's a solacing thought that every spite is evened out by a vis major.

(joking, of course...ok not really. but you get what i mean!)

It's easier to read this thread after you've Liz to your foes-list

EDIT:

[Airman]

Why are you responding to something that doesn't even remotely concern you apparently that "cheap attempt at inciting
a reaction" worked on you. Just by typing up that mini-essay you made yourself look like a "obnoxious, self-centered, puerile
nuisances", you're just calling more attention to yourself and this topic. Oh, and that jump of a bridge comment was really necessary,
if you're really going to nerd-rage over something like this you really need to sort out your priorities.

[gawdzilla]

;o

[Phytotron]

And you, Airman, haven't posted here since December, and that was in the thread in which your deviant klan and the other little snot-nosed cretins who've shat all over this forum were making trouble and causing so-called "drama." Indeed, most of your 12 posts were in that thread. So, I wonder by what happenstance you suddenly got the inclination to come check out the forum. So, was it Mecca or Liz who told you, "lulz OMG Airman go look at the forum and how Phytotron took the bait and nerd-raged LOLOL!" And then you to pretend like you're above it all. I'm sure you damn well know that this crap has been ongoing for several months—before I even returned to the forum—and is not an isolated incident. Please, who are you kidding?

[gawdzilla]

;oo

[Mecca]

LOL Liz! Classic...

Check out this one lol.

http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/9176 ... 1at630.png

I thought it was a rather funny moment in tron chat.

[DaWg]

What version of tron are u running mecca?

[Mecca]

I am currently using .3, that was an older screenshot I think.

[TaZ]

[Phytotron]

Bunch of narcissistic, nihilistic, half-brained, preteen scumbags. Why don't we just hand this site over to vcl and the rest of their cronies. They've already turned it into their own little befouled playground with regular impunity; just make it official.

[sinewav]

just make it official.

Might as well. Interesting threads are far and few between nowadays. Place is pretty much dead anyway.

[gawdzilla]

ontopic

[Z-Man]

Right. Locked while I clear this up.

First, on the nature of this thread. The topic says "Random Screenshots Thread". Yes, it started with interesting bug screenshots, but you can't expect people to read the first page. The nature of long threads is that they wander off the original topic, especially if it's in no correlation with the thread title. In web jagon, putting 'Random' in a thread title means 'anything goes', as long as it's decent. So Liz's post Phytotron originally complained about (he first reported it, I closed/deleted the report and told him why) is perfectly OK. If you want a "Bug Screenshots" thread, name it that way.

Phytotron then decides to explode publicly, asking me via PM not to blame him if things erupt. Well, duh. No. That's a warning.

However, his post's presence here changes how the rest of your posts get interpreted. Pointless and provocative shots (especially those containing words some parents don't want their children to read) are no longer random, they clearly are posted to provoke further reaction from Phytotron (which worked), possibly to make us moderators punish him more (which doesn't). Liz, Taz and Mecca get warnings, Liz a short ban on top of that. Grow up.

Oh, and any complaints about those warnings will directly lead to bans.

Edit: Right, split this junk. I'm leaving it public for now, but I'll edit out the offending pictures.