Who is actually active?

[Luke-Jr]

Can we get a list of actual active contributors? I don't mean just listed as "active" status, but actually having time to do things... I'm also including non-developers who contribute in other ways than code. If you're not listed on this (updated) post -- or you're listed with a "?" or wrong status --, please reply with which category you belong under

(for reference, I plan to follow this up with a request to guru3/z-man/Lucifer to grant at least one person on the Actually Active list access to the various resources we have available, especially webhosting)

Actually Active:
* dlh (dev) ?
* epsy (dev)
* Kyle (dev)
* Lackadastical (web)
* luke-jr (dev)
* Pathetique ?
* Seeker (test + doc)

"Active":
* guru3 (dev + web?)
* Jonathan (dev)
* Lucifer (dev)
* sine.wav (content)
* voodoo ?
* wrtlprnft (dev)
* yaart ?
* z-man (dev)

Formally Retired:
* everyone else ?

[sinewav]

Actually Active.

[Lackadaisical]

Actually active (although not last/this week)

[epsy]

I am active, though into side-projects. I'll concentrate on windows support soon enough on the cmake branch. However, I need someone else to work on the OSX part.

[gawdzilla]

Are you guys gonna/working on armagetron 0.4?

[Luke-Jr]

Are you guys gonna/working on armagetron 0.4?

This belongs on the 0.4 thread... :p

[Your_mom]

"lurking"

[Jonathan]

For completeness, I'd put myself under the "active"/lurking label.

[Stealer]

I'm hoping to be.

[Luke-Jr]

I'm hoping to be.

You registered just to post this... who are you?

Might I suggest popping in on IRC? We hang out in #Armagetron on Freenode.

[Pathetique]

Ohai Luke.

I hurd u liek mudkipz.

I would place myself in the gametype/server development category.

And can I have my resource account reactivated?

[Luke-Jr]

I would place myself in the gametype/server development category.

Are you actually active or just "active"? I only recall seeing a single small branch by you a while back (currently on my 0.4 proposed merge list...) :p

And can I have my resource account reactivated?

Resource accounts have never been deactivated. Also, OFF TOPIC HERE. Open a new thread for this nonsense next time.

[Pathetique]

I would place myself in the gametype/server development category.

Are you actually active or just "active"? I only recall seeing a single small branch by you a while back (currently on my 0.4 proposed merge list...) :p

That's the only enhancement I've had to make so far to let my ideas take form for a server. Other than that, I do contribute development ideas that are beyond my programming abilities.

[compguygene]

I would place myself in the gametype/server development category.

Are you actually active or just "active"? I only recall seeing a single small branch by you a while back (currently on my 0.4 proposed merge list...) :p

That's the only enhancement I've had to make so far to let my ideas take form for a server. Other than that, I do contribute development ideas that are beyond my programming abilities.

I think that Luke is trying to identify those that are actually active writing code at this time, or plan to be. Luke seems to have been trying to get people on board with getting the coding going that needs done for a .4 stable client/server to be released.

[Luke-Jr]

Other than that, I do contribute development ideas that are beyond my programming abilities.

Actively, or just occasionally ("active")?