my fps are getting eaten until i have 0 left

For all the help you need with Armagetron!
Post Reply

what are your fps normally?

>10
0
No votes
10-20
0
No votes
20-30
0
No votes
30-40
2
20%
40-50
1
10%
50-60
1
10%
60-70
0
No votes
70-80
0
No votes
80-90
0
No votes
90-100 or 100+
6
60%
 
Total votes: 10

hsnow
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 1:42 am

my fps are getting eaten until i have 0 left

Post by hsnow »

my fps keeps getting eaten and it goes from 50+ to 0 in a matter of minutes how do i fix this so my fps dont always get eaten alive
signatures suck
Hoax
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 892
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 5:24 pm
Location: UK

Post by Hoax »

Always keep your computer well fed.
User avatar
wrtlprnft
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1679
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:42 am
Location: 0x08048000
Contact:

Post by wrtlprnft »

Hmm, my framerate is greater than 10fps AND between 20fps and 30fps.
Which option should I vote for? What's the point of this poll?

Can you be more specific about your system?
There's no place like ::1
User avatar
philippeqc
Long Poster - Project Developer - Sage
Posts: 1526
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 8:55 am
Location: Stockholm
Contact:

Post by philippeqc »

[quote="wrtlprnft"]Hmm, my framerate is greater than 10fps AND between 20fps and 30fps.
Which option should I vote for? [quote]
Pfff, you think you have it hard!!!! MY system is both greater than 10 AND "90-100 or 100+"

hsnow: lowering your resolution always help. Dropping visual option too.

/ph
Canis meus id comedit.
hsnow
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 1:42 am

fps

Post by hsnow »

if i make my resolution any lower than 1024x768 then it will screw up really bad
signatures suck
hsnow
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 1:42 am

lol

Post by hsnow »

wrtlprnft wrote:Hmm, my framerate is greater than 10fps AND between 20fps and 30fps.
Which option should I vote for? What's the point of this poll?

Can you be more specific about your system?
im using Windows Vista Premium with an Acer Aspire 5610-4491 with Intel Duo Core Processer T2250 (1.73 GHz, 533 MHz FBS, 2MB cache)
is that specific enough for you or do you need my IP address, my DNS, my phone number, my blood type, my email address, my regular address (do i need to go on with the list?)
signatures suck
User avatar
Jonathan
A Brave Victim
Posts: 3391
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Not really lurking anymore

Post by Jonathan »

Yes, and we need pictures and a history of where you've been in the last three years, too.

Can you get other drivers for your GPU? Windows' standard drivers are known to be bad for OpenGL, and it's worse with Vista.
ˌɑrməˈɡɛˌtrɑn
User avatar
philippeqc
Long Poster - Project Developer - Sage
Posts: 1526
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 8:55 am
Location: Stockholm
Contact:

Re: fps

Post by philippeqc »

hsnow wrote:if i make my resolution any lower than 1024x768 then it will screw up really bad
"IT" being your monitor or the game? It is possible to change the game resolution to be less than that of the monitor (even worked on a 1024x768 lcd on my laptop, on which I ran the game at the flashy resolution of 320x200). But your configuration is not mine.
is that specific enough for you or do you need my IP address, my DNS, my phone number, my blood type, my email address, my regular address (do i need to go on with the list?)
No need to be nasty because he pointed out mistake in the poll you raised and question the purpose you are trying to achieve with it.
hsnow wrote:Can you be more specific about your system?
im using Windows Vista Premium with an Acer Aspire 5610-4491 with Intel Duo Core Processer T2250 (1.73 GHz, 533 MHz FBS, 2MB cache)[/quote]

One last relevant piece of info about your system you forgot to mention: the graphic card! Acer Aspire, that sound like a laptop. Usually laptops have integrated graphic card with quite mid-range accelerated 3D support (hence my choice of resolution on my laptop). See that you have the latest drivers for your hardware (not the ones downloaded from Microsoft web site, you need to go to the manufacturer of the chipset and/or Acer's web site).

Also, you should know that Microsoft decided that Vista would not have accelerated support for OpenGL, only for DirectX (*). This game is OpenGL. This mean that the processor doesn't get any help to do the drawing from the graphic card, which might be source of the performance drop you observe. I've heard through the branches (it must be z-man who said it) that some video card company (might be nVidia/ATI) actually offer OplenGL accelerated drivers for their chipset. See if this is the case for you.

I hope something in there is of help to you.

-ph
* My sources on that are quite old, they might have changed this decision. You should contact Microsoft to know what is the status of this.

FYI:
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+ with a GeForce 6600 running at 1280x1024 on Linux (Ubuntu) with all options turn on: the game start at 250-300 and will soon stabilize at ~45fps on a network game. Sampling of 1 server.

Edit: Jonathan already took the "GPU + OpenGL + Windows = no fun" angle.
Canis meus id comedit.
Post Reply