Lots of spam
Moderator: Lucifer
- Jonathan
- A Brave Victim
- Posts: 3391
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 12:50 am
- Location: Not really lurking anymore
Lots of spam
I just reverted 12 edits by 11 spammers made in just a few hours. Is there anything that can be done about that other than manually chasing them?
Edit: I should note that each time typically 16 to 17 k of spam was added.
Edit: I should note that each time typically 16 to 17 k of spam was added.
ˌɑrməˈɡɛˌtrɑn
- philippeqc
- Long Poster - Project Developer - Sage
- Posts: 1526
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 8:55 am
- Location: Stockholm
- Contact:
Could the account creation be "downgraded" from fully automated to semi-automated. If someone manually check that an account created is valid, it should restrict the number of spam poster, and therefore the number of spam post. The good old "please write a short text why you would like to get edit access on our wiki" might do the trick.
Nota: I know noting of the current mechanism for account creation on the wiki.
-ph
Nota: I know noting of the current mechanism for account creation on the wiki.
-ph
Canis meus id comedit.
- Tank Program
- Forum & Project Admin, PhD
- Posts: 6711
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 7:03 pm
- Lucifer
- Project Developer
- Posts: 8640
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 3:32 pm
- Location: Republic of Texas
- Contact:
The three measures I'd taken were:
* Install Bad Behavior
* Install SpamBlacklist (available from mediawiki's extensions directory in their svn repo)
* Add these lines to your .htacess file:
Last working version of bad behavior that I installed is attached.
http://wiki.davefancella.com/index.php/Special:Version <--- old wiki is still there so you can see what was installed
* Install Bad Behavior
* Install SpamBlacklist (available from mediawiki's extensions directory in their svn repo)
* Add these lines to your .htacess file:
Code: Select all
SetEnvIf User-Agent ^$ spammer=yes # block blank user agents
Order allow,deny
allow from all
deny from env=spammer
http://wiki.davefancella.com/index.php/Special:Version <--- old wiki is still there so you can see what was installed
- Attachments
-
- bad-behavior-2.0.5.zip
- Unzip it and read the readme, of course. It goes right in...
- (28.9 KiB) Downloaded 390 times
- wrtlprnft
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1679
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:42 am
- Location: 0x08048000
- Contact:
Meh, I don't like these user agent checking things. They're really just delaying it, it won't take long for everyone to use an IE6 user agent.
There's a far better extension on wikipedia itself (at least it was there, dunno if it still is): You have to enter a captcha if you try to add an external link to a page. If someone finds this plugin, we could “personalize” it to make it output a random question specific to arma or something…
There's a far better extension on wikipedia itself (at least it was there, dunno if it still is): You have to enter a captcha if you try to add an external link to a page. If someone finds this plugin, we could “personalize” it to make it output a random question specific to arma or something…
There's no place like ::1
- Lucifer
- Project Developer
- Posts: 8640
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 3:32 pm
- Location: Republic of Texas
- Contact:
Bad behavior does more than user-agent checks for precisely those reasons. The .htacess hack is just a hack that most spammers have adapted to anyway, but for the ones that have not, letting apache do the work saves the load of running php for the request. The SpamBlacklist is a blacklist of known spambots (and their signatures) kept by mediawiki, and the data that feeds it mostly comes from wikipedia.
There's an interesting captcha project where the captchas also help digitize books. I'd prefer that one, if we use a captcha at all.
There's an interesting captcha project where the captchas also help digitize books. I'd prefer that one, if we use a captcha at all.