New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)
Moderator: Light
-
- On Lightcycle Grid
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:33 am
New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)
Hello
Let's do a ladle!
Sign up here ! ---> http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php/ ... enge_Board
Based on positive feedback during ladle 111, we've decided to use the New fort settings :_)
Here's a link to the wiki page about Newfort settings --> http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php?title=Newfort
Here are some of the differences between fort and newfort
• Modified map
• Rim Acceleration (cycle_accel_rim 1.3)
• Losing points after holing (score_hole -2)
• Cycle tails are shorter (walls_length 395)
• 5v5 instead of 6v6 (team_max_players 5
Discord --> https://discordapp.com/channels/3739372 ... 5117284352
Let's do a ladle!
Sign up here ! ---> http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php/ ... enge_Board
Based on positive feedback during ladle 111, we've decided to use the New fort settings :_)
Here's a link to the wiki page about Newfort settings --> http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php?title=Newfort
Here are some of the differences between fort and newfort
• Modified map
• Rim Acceleration (cycle_accel_rim 1.3)
• Losing points after holing (score_hole -2)
• Cycle tails are shorter (walls_length 395)
• 5v5 instead of 6v6 (team_max_players 5
Discord --> https://discordapp.com/channels/3739372 ... 5117284352
- kyle
- Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
- Posts: 1876
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:33 pm
- Location: Indiana, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe, Multiverse
- Contact:
Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)
I was curious about the settings change, so I looked it up, Beside the map / resource repository change
CYCLE_ACCEL_RIM changed from 0 to 1.3 (I think CTWF was 1.1 on most maps)
WALLS_LENGTH changed from 400 to 395
SCORE_HOLE changed from 0 to -2
(SP_)TEAM_MAX_PLAYERS changed from 6 to 5
(SP_)TEAM_MAX_IMBALANCE changed from 6 to 5
Additionally
SPAM_MAXLEN changed from 150 to 200 (You can now say more)
ACCESS_LEVEL_OP changed from 2 to 6
(SP_)SIZE_FACTOR changed from 0 to 8
(SP_)LIMIT_ROUNDS changed from 2020 to 1933
SP_LIMIT_TIME changed from 30 to 21600
and the comment for WIN_ZONE_RANDOMNESS was removed
CYCLE_ACCEL_RIM changed from 0 to 1.3 (I think CTWF was 1.1 on most maps)
WALLS_LENGTH changed from 400 to 395
SCORE_HOLE changed from 0 to -2
(SP_)TEAM_MAX_PLAYERS changed from 6 to 5
(SP_)TEAM_MAX_IMBALANCE changed from 6 to 5
Additionally
SPAM_MAXLEN changed from 150 to 200 (You can now say more)
ACCESS_LEVEL_OP changed from 2 to 6
(SP_)SIZE_FACTOR changed from 0 to 8
(SP_)LIMIT_ROUNDS changed from 2020 to 1933
SP_LIMIT_TIME changed from 30 to 21600
and the comment for WIN_ZONE_RANDOMNESS was removed
Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)
hello who wants to be in my team
Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)
Nice! Let's get some more teams signed up.
Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)
Ladle 112 authorities are up. Server owners should update their configs.
http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php? ... rd#Servers
http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php? ... rd#Servers
Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)
Recordings:
final_12345_vs_classic.aarec 14372kb 1619s
semi_classic_vs_newbornkittens.aarec 17088kb 1992s
semi_rt_vs_12345.aarec 23332kb 2347s
final_12345_vs_classic.aarec 14372kb 1619s
semi_classic_vs_newbornkittens.aarec 17088kb 1992s
semi_rt_vs_12345.aarec 23332kb 2347s
Yeah, about that... can we change it back, please? It's insignificant to gameplay, and the value 2020 was honoring the forum member mostly responsible for creating this tournament format. I'm sure the real reason is something innocent, but without context, and there is none given, 1933 looks like we're celebrating German Nazi's rise to power. To be clear, I'm not offended. I just don't want to attract those who might like that idea.
Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)
ggs! Thanks to everyone who played and all server donors who made it possible. It was fun!
A couple of footnotes:
Teams "Ampz" and "Team FoFo" were impromptu teams, formed last-minute and added to the brackets in post. That explains the imbalanced brackets, which is an after-construction. Their team names and player lists may need revision.
"Ampz" played a best of 3 against _~Rogue Tronners~_ in the semifinal slot (result: 2-0), but as far as I know we don't have a protocol for semi-double-elimination, so we have decided together that we'll remember that match as an unofficial friendly.
Thanks for noticing, and I second that motion.Z-Man wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:41 pm Yeah, about that... can we change it back, please? It's insignificant to gameplay, and the value 2020 was honoring the forum member mostly responsible for creating this tournament format. I'm sure the real reason is something innocent, but without context, and there is none given, 1933 looks like we're celebrating German Nazi's rise to power. To be clear, I'm not offended. I just don't want to attract those who might like that idea.
A couple of footnotes:
Teams "Ampz" and "Team FoFo" were impromptu teams, formed last-minute and added to the brackets in post. That explains the imbalanced brackets, which is an after-construction. Their team names and player lists may need revision.
"Ampz" played a best of 3 against _~Rogue Tronners~_ in the semifinal slot (result: 2-0), but as far as I know we don't have a protocol for semi-double-elimination, so we have decided together that we'll remember that match as an unofficial friendly.
Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)
Ah, sorry for missing the recording. I didn't pay full attention to the action on the servers or the Discord chat.
Re: New Fort Ladle 112 ( April 5th)
It wasn't clear to anyone until it happened, I think. So no worries there!