Ladle 83 Rule Change Discussion
Moderator: Light
Re: Ladle 83 Rule Change Discussion
I made a few small wiki edits to reflect actual practice since we have yet to come up with a better system. Concord and I talked briefly about how to increase transparency without compromising anonymity. He had a good idea of sending votes to two Ladle enthusiasts instead of one. Their combined tallies would/should reduce errors and eliminate the need for receipts. However, we have not determined how to select a second Ladle enthusiast (other than someone volunteering) and how to ensure votes go to both people. We can always decide this later. It would be a small change. Trials do not happen often so we can take our time.
Re: Ladle 83 Rule Change Discussion
What's wrong with receipts?
Re: Ladle 83 Rule Change Discussion
Nothing really. They allow individual voters to see if their vote is recorded correctly, but do little to assure the community there is no foul play -- unless the voters publicly acknowledge this. It is hard enough to get people motivated to vote let alone following up on a public thread. We are just trying to make the whole process easier.theo wrote:What's wrong with receipts?