No, I'm pretty sure I made it clear in my post that nobody gives a **** about Accel vs Sh. Can you read?Pr3 wrote:Did he give two fu#ks?
Please provide us with proof that Mister knew I played with Accel.
Moderator: Light
No, I'm pretty sure I made it clear in my post that nobody gives a **** about Accel vs Sh. Can you read?Pr3 wrote:Did he give two fu#ks?
I wasn't aware feigning ignorance was a get-out-of-jail-free cardVogue wrote:No, I'm pretty sure I made it clear in my post that nobody gives a **** about Accel vs Sh. Can you read?Pr3 wrote:Did he give two fu#ks?
Please provide us with proof that Mister knew I played with Accel.
Prema wrote:The second match starts, a new beginning,
Nanu and Prema, Sui and Ninja,
versus those same old hoes grinning.
I am not looking for a rematch.Vogue wrote:Anyway, go have your rematch with R if that makes your butt feel a little better. Ban me from ladle for a lifetime for all I care, IDGAF.
Mommy jokes o.0 aren't we a bit old for that liz?Vogue wrote:Yeah, Mister almost likes coke more than Gazelle's mom.
Besides the obvious fact that he did know, it is his responsibility as team leader to check that before he allows anyone to play for his team.Vogue wrote:No, I'm pretty sure I made it clear in my post that nobody gives a **** about Accel vs Sh. Can you read?Pr3 wrote:Did he give two fu#ks?
Please provide us with proof that Mister knew I played with Accel.
Forget the rematch. The Ladle is over, R won and all we can do now is clean up your mess.Vogue wrote: Anyway, go have your rematch with R if that makes your butt feel a little better. Ban me from ladle for a lifetime for all I care, IDGAF.
Stop crying and follow the procedure.Players can be issued warnings by the Ladle community using a voting trial. If a player is accused of violating a rule or committing an offense not defined by the rules, then a trial will be run with the following question. Note: this question should be modified to pertain to the accused player and action committed.
Did the accused player, <name>, violate Rule #<n> or commit an offense? No, Yes and they should receive (1 warning, 2 warnings, 3 warnings)
If neither option receives 2/3 of the vote, then “No” is the winner. For the “Yes” option to win it must receive 2/3 of the vote. If the “Yes” option is the winner and there is a tie between the number of warning choices, then the leftmost tied-option is the winner.
Warnings have the following rules:
If a player is convicted of committing an offense, then all active warnings will stay active for an additional 2 Ladles. Otherwise if a warning has expired, then it can be rescinded.
If a player is sentenced to 1, 2, or 3 warnings from the trial, then the warning(s) will be added to the Penalty Box. They will initially expire after 4, 8, and 12 Ladles respectively.
If a player has 2 or more active warnings, then they can not be a Team Leader.
If a player is convicted of committing an offense and has 3 or more active warnings, then they will serve a Ladle suspension of length 2 ^ (number of active warnings - 3). Here is a list of examples:
3 warnings: 2 ^ (3 - 3) = 2 ^ 0 = 1 Ladle
4 warnings: 2 ^ (4 - 3) = 2 ^ 1 = 2 Ladles
5 warnings: 2 ^ (5 - 3) = 2 ^ 2 = 4 Ladles
…
If a player is suspended from the Ladle, then all active warnings will stay active for an additional amount by the length of the suspension.
The rules are applied in the order in which they are defined, and they will be applied after all Ladle-specific activites have completed (games, voting trials, etc…). Warnings and suspensions will be tracked on the Penalty Box page, each entry having a supporting link to the forum thread with the results.