Ladle 80

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply
armathingy
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 12:14 am

Re: Ladle 80

Post by armathingy »

We will miss ks they were lot of fun.


Here is a picture to remember them:

http://i.imgur.com/PjmRQaH.png


Also a transcript: http://bpaste.net/show/XxKi0aKME9kusseWCZH9/

User avatar
Soul
Match Winner
Posts: 449
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 4:45 pm

Re: Ladle 80

Post by Soul »

armathingy wrote:We will miss ks they were lot of fun.


Here is a picture to remember them:

http://i.imgur.com/PjmRQaH.png


Also a transcript: http://bpaste.net/show/XxKi0aKME9kusseWCZH9/
LOL
Someone give this man a tronny!

Also, +1 to titan and gonzap
Chief Justice of the Armagetron Advanced Judicial System.
---------------
Notable Bans Issued:
Vogue - 12 month ban(x2)
Lucifer - 1 Day

misterplayer
Average Program
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:59 pm

Re: Ladle 80

Post by misterplayer »

armathingy wrote:We will miss ks they were lot of fun.


Here is a picture to remember them:

http://i.imgur.com/PjmRQaH.png


Also a transcript: http://bpaste.net/show/XxKi0aKME9kusseWCZH9/

the time this took our of someones day just to bash ks is sorta hilarious

User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6273
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle 80

Post by sinewav »

That picture was hilarious, haha. Good comedy there.
Soul wrote:Also, +1 to titan and gonzap
I'm glad this Bowl conversation is going smoothly. If we don't hear any objections over the next couple weeks I'll write the additions into the wiki and we can move forward, for the benefit of all!

"To qualify, a team must have at least 5 players who played 5 times with that team during the season. A high-ranked, unqualified team will get bumped out and the lower ranked teams will get pushed up into seeded positions."

So it looks like CT, RT, and uNk will all get a seed unless they don't meet the 5 player rule. Umm... there is no danger of this, is there? I haven't checked. Man it would suck if our community is so lax we can't get just 4 teams to stay together for 9 months...

User avatar
orion
Match Winner
Posts: 782
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Ladle 80

Post by orion »

ouch, the fight between those 3 was going to be the big thing of this ladle
Image

Overrated
Match Winner
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:32 am

Re: Ladle 80

Post by Overrated »

orion wrote:ouch, the fight between those 3 was going to be the big thing of this ladle
This is why the timing seemed so odd to me of this whole KS thing going down. It ended up ruining a very intense showdown, especially if one of these three played in the opening round!
BRAWL dead. RIP.

Fort is like a box of knives, you never know when you're going to be cut.

Vogue
Match Winner
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:50 pm

Re: Ladle 80

Post by Vogue »

armathingy wrote:We will miss ks they were lot of fun.


Here is a picture to remember them:

http://i.imgur.com/PjmRQaH.png


Also a transcript: http://bpaste.net/show/XxKi0aKME9kusseWCZH9/
I laughed. :P Too bad you didn't have the cojones to post it under your own account, tho.

why hasnt anyone figured out the ks drama is an april fools joke?

User avatar
takburger
Match Winner
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:34 pm

Re: Ladle 80

Post by takburger »

Vogue wrote:snt anyone figured out the ks drama is an april fools joke? [/size]
Use the transcript given by the guy you quoted and do ctrl+f "april" and you'll find that we thought about it already.
Image

User avatar
Luiso
Average Program
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:27 am

Re: Ladle 80

Post by Luiso »

Vogue wrote:
armathingy wrote:We will miss ks they were lot of fun.


Here is a picture to remember them:

http://i.imgur.com/PjmRQaH.png


Also a transcript: http://bpaste.net/show/XxKi0aKME9kusseWCZH9/
I laughed. :P Too bad you didn't have the cojones to post it under your own account, tho.

why hasnt anyone figured out the ks drama is an april fools joke?
Wait is cojones an english word? lol didn't know
And I figured it vogue, and quantic told me it's way too early to make an april fools joke, I don't trust you yet tbh
I am not responsible for the content of this message ;)

User avatar
Gazelle
Match Winner
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:06 am

Re: Ladle 80

Post by Gazelle »

An april fools joke! How come I didnt know about it... Great liz stabbed me in the back tooo! Shit i knew it! Guess they really just wanted to get rid of me ;)

Would be funny if this really was an april fools joke guys :) but im sure a clan can run perfectly fine and compete with just 3 members.

Cody
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 959
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 6:43 am

Re: Ladle 80

Post by Cody »

peace bitches, you all suck.

Cadillac_
Average Program
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 11:26 pm

Re: Ladle 80

Post by Cadillac_ »

Are you the real "April 1"?
Only idiots keep their clans at default values.

its not even 3 people any more as concord applied to ct
Apparently wap reverse recruited concord...
Edit: sadly it wasn't (probably) him, it's a shame, I had a good gif coming
Pathetique: ALSO AM DRONK
------------------------------
Image
Lol^^^

User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6273
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle 80

Post by sinewav »

Not to make this Ladle thread all about the Bowl, but since we are already having a good discussion I have another issue to bring up. Actually, Orion (J6R!) has brought it up to me in a PM.

Orion did not join Redemption's roster until L-77. After L-80 he will appear with them only 4 times this season. However, he played as a substitute for Rd in L-74. Now the question is, does this count as a 5th appearance?

Bowl guidelines are clear: be serious, be seen. The Challenge Board is the only record we have to determine eligibility. Generally, we allow Challenge Board edits after Ladles to reflect actual outcomes. However, I am inclined to say "if you didn't care enough to make edits back then, tough luck!" On the other hand, this situation would only affect a small, small number of players. Pointing to a specific time inside a debug recording would easily verify the claim. So, I wonder if we should allow players to appeal their eligibility by providing (1) the file name from the debug archive and (2) a --fastforward time for me/us to look at. I certainly don't want to do any more work than I have to, but I also want this event to be as fair and accessible as possible.

To summarize, do we restrict eligibility to the Challenge Board as is, or do we allow an appeal for substitutes? (The main argument being that, while having played, a substitute is not part of the team.)

User avatar
orion
Match Winner
Posts: 782
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Ladle 80

Post by orion »

thanks sine, unfortunably cant find a record of the game I played in, i wasnt able to make that ladle (i was going to play for CTb) i finally came late but they has loss on first rounds, i saw rd was lacking players on second round and played 1 game there or something.


After looking how was my participation with teams on this season seems like i could miss it for an stupid mistake that a leader should have fixed, i guess. It happened me twice this season (also ladle 76) where i was on CTb and then played for CTa.

Hope you can understand, thanks
Image

User avatar
Gazelle
Match Winner
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:06 am

Re: Ladle 80

Post by Gazelle »

I can vouch for Orion, i played ladle 74 with redemption and i recall him subbing in for us :)


Now with that being said, i do believe its fair to allow him to play, because he technically played in 5 ladles with redemption this season.

Post Reply