Ladle 71

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply
User avatar
dlh
Formerly That OS X Guy
Posts: 2035
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 12:05 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle 71

Post by dlh »

orion wrote:Yes got confused because of P. Fire. Anyway unkteam won more matches they are supposed to be 5th.
No team is 5th, because there is no criteria to determine a 5th seed.

/pedant

User avatar
ElmosWorld
Match Winner
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:38 pm

Re: Ladle 71

Post by ElmosWorld »

Is this the first time that 2 teams won't claim their seed?
Image

User avatar
þsy
Match Winner
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:52 pm

Re: Ladle 71

Post by þsy »

I haven't been keeping up with all the clan comings and goings this month, and I have no idea who is teamless for this ladle. But, as one of the two teams with a seed, if anyone wants to play for us this ladle then PM me on http://helloteam.freeforums.org/index.php. We barely have enough for a team right now, and we only want the best! As always, no strings attached 8)

Also, we'll be called 'hello team' this ladle (and probably into the future), I hope there's no trouble moving the seed from 'the 70s team' to 'hello team'

User avatar
orion
Match Winner
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Ladle 71

Post by orion »

þsy wrote:Also, we'll be called 'hello team' this ladle
hope we gain a medal for worst ladle name ever..
Image

User avatar
orion
Match Winner
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Ladle 71

Post by orion »

Can somebody please explain me the seed rules? Why 70`s or 71 isnt seeded? from the rules i rode, we are able

The team name must remain the same. The exception is a slight variation or abbreviation of the name. However, it should be obvious to the person making the brackets this is a returning team with a seed. Please use good sense if you must use a variant or abbreviation. We changed only one digit
The team must have either:
The same captain (or at least one captain out of the two, if there were two) and three additional players who were on the challenge board the previous ladle or
Five players who were on the challenge board in the previous ladle. Player names are restricted to the same guidelines as team names (above). Ogopogo as captain, rudy pressure pyrrhic and me were on the last ladle.
If your team does not meet these requirements you lose your seed and lower seeds move up to fill your position.
Image

Venijn
Round Winner
Posts: 230
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:18 pm

Re: Ladle 71

Post by Venijn »

One does not simply ride rules.

Anyway, are the additions Shock made valid?

I remember some mix-up or something with SP before, and people said it is fine, but he's added a team at 20:02BST. The deadline was missed, but how does it work now?

I don't really remember how the times work with BST etc.
Click. Image

User avatar
DaGarBBaGeMAN
Core Dumper
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:22 pm

Re: Ladle 71

Post by DaGarBBaGeMAN »

orion wrote:Can somebody please explain me the seed rules? Why 70`s or 71 isnt seeded? from the rules i rode, we are able

The team name must remain the same. The exception is a slight variation or abbreviation of the name. However, it should be obvious to the person making the brackets this is a returning team with a seed. Please use good sense if you must use a variant or abbreviation. We changed only one digit
The team must have either:
The same captain (or at least one captain out of the two, if there were two) and three additional players who were on the challenge board the previous ladle or
Five players who were on the challenge board in the previous ladle. Player names are restricted to the same guidelines as team names (above). Ogopogo as captain, rudy pressure pyrrhic and me were on the last ladle.
If your team does not meet these requirements you lose your seed and lower seeds move up to fill your position.
So does this mean brackets are going to be redone or 'w0t' and 'that 71's team' just going to switch? Also, if Ww doesn't have a spot because they signed up too late, I'm sure R is willing to give up their bye for them.
Image -made by az95

Image

User avatar
vov
Match Winner
Posts: 563
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: Ladle 71

Post by vov »

Sorry, didn't read this... I randomized the brackets assuming there was no 3rd seed since there was none pre-entered in the brackets. I don't know what's the best thing to do now. With my error there and WW's late signup, maybe they could be redone? One random result is just as good as another to me and if these brackets aren't legit, might as well redo it so they are. I don't know though :/

User avatar
ElmosWorld
Match Winner
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:38 pm

Re: Ladle 71

Post by ElmosWorld »

They're gonna have to be redone. I took them off when I left because they didn't meet the requirements to keep their seed, NOT because they changed one number. Ww would still not be included as they signed up after 1800 GMT.
Image

User avatar
orion
Match Winner
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Ladle 71

Post by orion »

wiki rules wrote:If vov makes the brackets, he will be banned for atleast 15 Ladles.
Image

Overrated
Match Winner
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:32 am

Re: Ladle 71

Post by Overrated »

Brackets have been redone. Sorry for any teams that may have now gotten a more "difficult" placement, and for others who may have an "easier" one.

Best of luck to all.

Edit: Also, since WW had signed up late, I kept them off of the remade brackets. R already accepted them for their bye if Rd will not accept their challenge.
BRAWL dead. RIP.

Fort is like a box of knives, you never know when you're going to be cut.

User avatar
Gazelle
Match Winner
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:06 am

Re: Ladle 71

Post by Gazelle »

Redemption has decided to drop our Bye so Wild West could compete in ladle.

There should be no problem with that, right?

User avatar
vov
Match Winner
Posts: 563
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: Ladle 71

Post by vov »

After all it's random. Just pretend those other brackets never existed and curse the RNG for the matchups...
woops

User avatar
Gazelle
Match Winner
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:06 am

Re: Ladle 71

Post by Gazelle »

vov wrote:After all it's random. Just pretend those other brackets never existed and curse the RNG for the matchups...
woops
bad vov bad. /me smacks vov on nose.

Overrated
Match Winner
Posts: 483
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:32 am

Re: Ladle 71

Post by Overrated »

Gazelle wrote:Redemption has decided to drop our Bye so Wild West could compete in ladle.

There should be no problem with that, right?
Yeah, I'll edit the brackets now for that adjustment. Simple as that. gg no re.
BRAWL dead. RIP.

Fort is like a box of knives, you never know when you're going to be cut.

Post Reply