Overrated wrote:I guess my only complaint is that I don't see that much value in 1v1 play to be worth 2000 points. Not as enteraining imo.
It also becomes complicated when you put forth subs in ladle/bowl play. How do you determine if a player only plays in the finals or is on the roster but didnt play at all? Also, how do you determine the quality of that person's points? A player could play absolutely terrible and earn the same amount of points as a person who literally carried their team on their back.
And thinking about it, it would be nice if it was more than just fort/sumo. Maybe toss in Brawl and DF, etc tourneys as well. Would seem fair and helps deem the best all around players.
Other than that I like the idea.
Well as i said the points could be fixed, i gave 2k points for 1v1 because its a solo victory, less points to ladle because its played every month and because what you said and more points for bowl because its played once a year. In my opinión a player should play atleast one match for get the points on the ladle/bowl/wst, i can guarantee you only the BEST players will be at top of the ranking.
About ctf and df, you know i play ctf but fort/sumo community and ctf/df community are almost totally separate. If the ranking goes well then we could give a try on a separate Rank for ctf and df
About players who are carried or play bad, thats why i think to give more points to tournaments who are played with less players in a team 1v1 then tst then wst then ladle ((i forgot to add sumo bar, i think you would like to play).