Fortress-For-All - Discussion

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply
User avatar
Ratchet
Match Winner
Posts: 779
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:55 am

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Ratchet »

It'll be extremely blatantly obvious once we begin it. It's idiot proof :)
Image
"Dream as if you'll live forever,
Live as if you'll die today." -James Dean
User avatar
Bytes
Round Winner
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 12:13 pm

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Bytes »

I've taken a look at the method, trust me, there will be no problem, the thing is click and drag simple. Anyone unsure about being a captain should sign up, I have all faith it will be a 15min job tops.
And yes I realise I haven't signed up to be a captain but I'll be away on Saturday so no calls of 'hypocrite' :P
Image
User avatar
Soul
Match Winner
Posts: 449
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 4:45 pm

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Soul »

Are we allowed to get subs if someone doesn't show/has to leave?
User avatar
Gazelle
Match Winner
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:06 am

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Gazelle »

Yeah, because i dont know where Opara is, he isnt under "Opara" on forums so i cannot contact him. And soul has to leave halfway through... But Red did say he would substitute if thats okay.
User avatar
Pr3
Round Winner
Posts: 356
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Pr3 »

In future FFAs could we require players to post their preferred position(s) next to their name. This would help in balancing the teams, and eliminate some confusion.
User avatar
Gazelle
Match Winner
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:06 am

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Gazelle »

Ashi, you are the sub for Opara if he does not show (Ratchet told me), because i have not heard anything from him..

Thanks :)
J Dawg
Round Winner
Posts: 210
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:57 am

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by J Dawg »

Pr3 wrote:In future FFAs could we require players to post their preferred position(s) next to their name. This would help in balancing the teams, and eliminate some confusion.
I dont think that would be a good idea. we Drafted players, so we chould know where they play. And also, I think the fun part about FFA is that players will have to play in different positions, it is a great way for newer players to started playing in different spots.

When I played I was mostly attack, so I always attacked, then one day, I was asked in a ladle to sweep, so I had to adapt, and eventually went to defending. This tourny is for players to try to adapt to different positions, and using teamwork to win.

If we just chose what we wanted for a position, It would feel kinda like pickup, I know my team doesnt know where ill put them. thats the excitement of it!
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Pr3
Round Winner
Posts: 356
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:41 pm

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Pr3 »

Going to pick 5 unreliable players next time. Gm(s) from the only team with original members :|.
User avatar
Bytes
Round Winner
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 12:13 pm

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Bytes »

Pre's Pros!

Gm's guys.
Image
User avatar
Ratchet
Match Winner
Posts: 779
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:55 am

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Ratchet »

Lots of rethinking to do! Too much sub-work, initial fear of players not showing up = confirmed
Image
"Dream as if you'll live forever,
Live as if you'll die today." -James Dean
Nagi
Core Dumper
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:34 pm

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Nagi »

Yay, pretty nice tournament, was lots of fun! \ó/ gms P1E and Gaz's chicks, and thx 6!
Zenith
Average Program
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 5:17 pm

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Zenith »

Piece of **** tourney, work out the ******* subs
Too underdeveloped
I won't be playing in this again if major changes aren't made
Thanks
User avatar
Mkay1
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Mkay1 »

Pr3 wrote:Going to pick 5 unreliable players next time. Gm(s) from the only team with original members :|.
nope, the winning team did.


Don't listen to appleseed, Ratchet. Thanks for hosting this and taking the time to come up with an idea. There were some kinks but there are in ALL tournaments, its expected.
Also - nobody ******* cares if you don't play in the next one apple, even if you do decide to sign up, ha :).
Last edited by Mkay1 on Sun May 19, 2013 9:43 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Ratchet
Match Winner
Posts: 779
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:55 am

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Ratchet »

Zenith wrote:Piece of **** tourney, work out the ******* subs
Too underdeveloped
I won't be playing in this again if major changes aren't made
Thanks
you didn't even sign up, noob

GZ DGM's team
Image
"Dream as if you'll live forever,
Live as if you'll die today." -James Dean
Peat
On Lightcycle Grid
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 5:08 pm

Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion

Post by Peat »

Gms. Someone was pounding on my door right at the end, I momentarily forgot it was 98- and failed xD (excuses). Really enjoyed the tournament though, would definitely play again.

I agree that the sub situation was a bit ridiculous though.
Post Reply