Fortress-For-All - Discussion
Moderator: Light
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
gm Sain's and and DGM's, and gz DGM's superheroes
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
Wasnt it like a bigger spoon?
- DaGarBBaGeMAN
- Core Dumper
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:22 pm
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
We were also a team with all our original members, and we ended up winning the whole thing, so you don't have to pick 5 unreliable players next time.Pr3 wrote:Going to pick 5 unreliable players next time. Gm(s) from the only team with original members .
GM's everyone - agreed that the rules weren't perfect, but that's why this was only the first FFA. Look forward to more in the future. Thanks for your organizing, Ratchet.
-made by az95
- ElmosWorld
- Match Winner
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:38 pm
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
How about draft the players 30 minutes to an hour before the tournament starts? Then you know who is going to be there and this won't happen next time?
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
Suck me nubeRatchet wrote:you didn't even sign up, noobZenith wrote:Piece of **** tourney, work out the ******* subs
Too underdeveloped
I won't be playing in this again if major changes aren't made
Thanks
GZ DGM's team
Honestly I didn't have a clue about FFA until today.
Gazelle asked me to sub so I went.
If there was something in the rule books restricting subs or something, it would probably have been better. Gz to DGM though.
Also elmo, that would have helped.
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
orion wrote:Wasnt it like a bigger spoon?
ElmosWorld wrote:How about draft the players 30 minutes to an hour before the tournament starts? Then you know who is going to be there and this won't happen next time?
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
Im so so sorry guys, my internet gave out during the finals! Wish i could've been there to try and help us win!
Next time!
Sorry again..
And Congratz to DGM's team, very well deserved, you all put on one hell of a show!
Next time!
Sorry again..
And Congratz to DGM's team, very well deserved, you all put on one hell of a show!
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
Gm's all, was fun!
Big thanks to Ratchet for hosting this.
Big thanks to Ratchet for hosting this.
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
Asked you to sub for us Apple and you said no -.- Good thing we didn't need subs though.
Gms everyone, was fun
edit: and ofanxxx Joshie for hosting this <3
Gms everyone, was fun
edit: and ofanxxx Joshie for hosting this <3
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
Yeh, drafting half an hour before would probably be best
-
- Round Winner
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:05 pm
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
awsome fun, we got smoked by DGM's nubs but still gm's, next time i rq if i have titan on my team
im intruiged to find out how the newer fort players found this, since it was supposed to bring new players into fort?
im intruiged to find out how the newer fort players found this, since it was supposed to bring new players into fort?
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
I honestly thought this tournament was great! I thought ratchet put a lot of time and effort to organize this along with server tech too. I was very pleased with the outcome, even though my team did not win, I still really enjoyed the experience and I look forward to the next one too, please have it!
@bilbo: I am sorry that bilbo kicked you out of phoenix
@bilbo: I am sorry that bilbo kicked you out of phoenix
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
Yeah, it was a good tournament given everything. Sorry, just got really frustrated and annoyed that stereo decided to take over 20 minutes to take a dump and I don't like how it was assumed we would find time to get a sub from somewhere. Too busy trying to play to focus on getting another player. Other than that ggs, gms.
BRAWL dead. RIP.
Fort is like a box of knives, you never know when you're going to be cut.
Fort is like a box of knives, you never know when you're going to be cut.
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
Yeah, nice tourney Ratchet. Only to be expected there are some kinks to work out after the first try. Perhaps next time limit the number of teams to a "round" number so there are no byes. 8 probably, unless there is a lot of interest and you can bump it p to 16. With 8 teams, if you had 56 players that would be 6+1 so each team has an assigned sub, or possibly have 64 players, and if you pick 8 people and only 4 showed up, it's your won fault for picking unreliable players.
Re: Fortress-For-All - Discussion
I do think that byes should be done away with. The next tournament (assuming I do one next month) will definitely have 8 teams and a shorter sign up period.ppotter wrote:Yeah, nice tourney Ratchet. Only to be expected there are some kinks to work out after the first try. Perhaps next time limit the number of teams to a "round" number so there are no byes. 8 probably, unless there is a lot of interest and you can bump it p to 16. With 8 teams, if you had 56 players that would be 6+1 so each team has an assigned sub, or possibly have 64 players, and if you pick 8 people and only 4 showed up, it's your won fault for picking unreliable players.
This aims to bring down the number of people we have to rely on to show up. Additionally, by giving a two-week signup period people are more likely to remember they signed up and need to show up than if they sign up a month ahead.
Perhaps 8 teams of 6 (48) with two subs on each team (people who signed up late but are still willing to show up and play if possible) (54 total players) we can minimize the need for substitutes that aren't signed up. That system would have probably been effective given the current tournament procedures, but we didn't have enough substitutes signed up to assign them to teams this time. We had 6 subs and 10 teams.
Next time we will aim to have 8 players dedicated to each team - hopefully that'll be enough.
"Dream as if you'll live forever,
Live as if you'll die today." -James Dean