Ladle 55

A place for threads related to tournaments and the like, and things related too.

Moderator: Light

Post Reply
User avatar
dreadlord
Match Winner
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:26 am
Location: Germany

Re: Ladle 55

Post by dreadlord »

Concord wrote:+1 for TronZero #1 and CT Liv

good matches everyone
That.
Olive
Match Winner
Posts: 501
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:11 pm
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Ladle 55

Post by Olive »

dreadlord wrote:
Concord wrote:+1 for TronZero #1 and CT Liv

good matches everyone
That.
ditto
Olive a.k.a ZeMu, MoonFlower & chicken.
User avatar
Z-Man
God & Project Admin
Posts: 11585
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Cologne
Contact:

Re: Ladle 55

Post by Z-Man »

User avatar
Titanoboa
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1795
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:07 pm

Re: Ladle 55

Post by Titanoboa »

Thanks once again for the recordings, Z-man!
User avatar
DaGarBBaGeMAN
Core Dumper
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:22 pm

Re: Ladle 55

Post by DaGarBBaGeMAN »

you didn't get 3t's first round match? aw :(
Image -made by az95

Image
User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6413
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle 55

Post by sinewav »

+1 for CT USA. Felt pretty good for me.

Congrats Revolver.
User avatar
dlh
Formerly That OS X Guy
Posts: 2035
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 12:05 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle 55

Post by dlh »

Server Quality: +1 for TronZero 1, and CT LIV.

Good matches everyone. We didn't use a sweep-box, and I don't recall an opponent using one either. It definitely made the pace of the matches more fun, and it kept us on schedule.

Thanks Z-Man for recording.
Attachments
Ladle 55 Revolver.zip
Final scores for Revolver's matches.
(820.56 KiB) Downloaded 88 times
User avatar
Z-Man
God & Project Admin
Posts: 11585
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:01 pm
Location: Cologne
Contact:

Re: Ladle 55

Post by Z-Man »

DaGarBBaGeMAN wrote:you didn't get 3t's first round match? aw :(
No. I can only follow so many games at once with recording clients (where I can't do anything but watch, no pressing TAB to see scores or players, no page up to read past messages) and acceptable error rates, so I stick to the four designated quarter final servers and my own.
User avatar
dreadlord
Match Winner
Posts: 585
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:26 am
Location: Germany

Re: Ladle 55

Post by dreadlord »

dlh wrote:Server Quality: +1 for TronZero 1, and CT LIV.

Good matches everyone. We didn't use a sweep-box, and I don't recall an opponent using one either. It definitely made the pace of the matches more fun, and it kept us on schedule.

Thanks Z-Man for recording.
Yet another post I totally agree with. :)
User avatar
Mkay1
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Ladle 55

Post by Mkay1 »

3t used one. I solved that problem bye centering them, though.
Gonzap
Shutout Match Winner
Posts: 916
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 3:08 pm

Re: Ladle 55

Post by Gonzap »

-1 CT liv, crashed once and few slides but that might be my internet provider. Anyway the crash makes it -1.

Gz to the winners.
User avatar
Zimblunk
Average Program
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:41 pm
Location: USA

Re: Ladle 55

Post by Zimblunk »

Hey sine, I couldn't wait any longer to see the statistics page updated, so I did it myself; hope you don't mind. :)

Ladle 55 server ratings
0000: CT LIV (-1)
Vinny: CT LIV (-1)
vov: ID VA 2 (-10000000000) [I'm counting it as -1]
zat: ID VA 2 (-1)
ItzAcid: MBX (+1)
Titanoboa: Z-man's (+1), Tronzero 1 (+1)
Overrated: CT LIV (+1), Tronzero 2 (0)
Elmo: CT USA (+1), CT LIV (+1), CT MBX (+1)
Concord: TronZero 1 (+1), CT LIV (+1)
dreadlord / Olive: not sure if you're rating the servers, or just agreeing with Concord.
sinewav: CT USA (+1)
dlh: TronZero 1 (+1), CT LIV (+1)
Gonzap: CT LIV (-1)

Totals:
CT LIV: +1
ID VA 2: -2
CT MBX: +2
Z-man's: +1
TronZero 2: 0
CT USA: +2
TronZero 1: +3

And I'm presuming the Milestones section hasn't changed from last month.
Concord
Reverse Outside Corner Grinder
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:24 pm

Re: Ladle 55

Post by Concord »

I totalled them using decay of e^(-t/5), where t is the number of Ladles since the rating. For example, a rating of +1 is worth +1 this month, +0.82 after the next ladle, +0.67 the Ladle after that, +0.55, etc.
User avatar
sinewav
Graphic Artist
Posts: 6413
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:37 am
Contact:

Re: Ladle 55

Post by sinewav »

Concord wrote:I totalled them using decay of e^(-t/5), where t is the number of Ladles since the rating. For example, a rating of +1 is worth +1 this month, +0.82 after the next ladle, +0.67 the Ladle after that, +0.55, etc.
I don't understand your formula at all and I don't see how it makes a difference over a raw score without decay or smoothing.
Post Reply